Hi all,

I'd like to first introduce myself as a Lustre newbie who is interested in 
implementing Lustre on a small cluster to improve on NFSv3 limitations.  Let me 
describe my setup:

I have 11 execution nodes (104 cores total) which are each connected via 1GE to 
a fileserver (using 4x1GE aggregated link).  The fileserver currenty has a 
4-disk 1.5TB RAID10 array as its main storage, plus a 2-disk 2TB RAID1 array, 
and a 4-disk 4TB RAID6 array.  Whilst the RAID10 array must stay intact (due to 
system OS, shared application partitions etc etc), I'm looking to possibly 
reconfigure the 6 (2TB) disks into arrays suitable for serving 3 Lustre 
filesystems (/home, /storage, /scratch).  This would be with a view to having 
the MGS and 3 MDT partitions on the main storage, with OST partitions spread 
across the 6 disks.  

The question is, what is most efficient?  Given that my RAID controller is 
hardware-based (Dell PERC6), would it be better to split my 6 disks into 
multiple OSTs, or keep them as one big lump?  I've not seen a discussion of 
this in the Lustre doc, so I'd like to gather a few pointers/opinions, if I may?

Thanks,

Chris


--
Dr Chris Jewell
Department of Statistics
University of Warwick
Coventry
CV4 7AL
UK
Tel: +44 (0)24 7615 0778





_______________________________________________
Lustre-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss

Reply via email to