8TB LUN is a big device, I have ever had a 3TB OST device error, whose e2fsck consumed about 10 hours, with Lustre 1.8.1.1 and e2fsprogs-1.41.10.sun2. Maybe you can first upgrade your e2fsprogs?
2011/9/19 enqiang zhou <[email protected]>: > It's a 8TB LUN and e2fsck have lasted for about 30 hours.I'm not sure > if I should wait more enough time for the end.Bellow is part of > e2fsck's log. > > ... ... > Illegal block number passed to ext2fs_test_block_bitmap #4243581855 > for multiply claimed block map > Illegal block number passed to ext2fs_test_block_bitmap #2363489791 > for multiply claimed block map > Illegal block number passed to ext2fs_test_block_bitmap #4091539423 > for multiply claimed block map > Illegal block number passed to ext2fs_test_block_bitmap #3989622221 > for multiply claimed block map > Illegal block number passed to ext2fs_test_block_bitmap #1339682798 > for multiply claimed block map > Pass 1C: Scanning directories for inodes with multiply-claimed blocks > 19:06 > Pass 1D: Reconciling multiply-claimed blocks > > ... (inode #423776, mod time Tue Oct 6 18:10:49 1981) > ... (inode #405328, mod time Tue Oct 6 18:10:49 1981) > ... (inode #366432, mod time Tue Oct 6 18:10:49 1981) > ... (inode #349536, mod time Tue Oct 6 18:10:49 1981) > ... (inode #329824, mod time Tue Oct 6 18:10:49 1981) > ... (inode #312928, mod time Tue Oct 6 18:10:49 1981) > ... (inode #275296, mod time Tue Oct 6 18:10:49 1981) > ... (inode #238688, mod time Tue Oct 6 18:10:49 1981) > ... (inode #223056, mod time Tue Oct 6 18:10:49 1981) > ... (inode #220768, mod time Tue Oct 6 18:10:49 1981) > ... (inode #201056, mod time Tue Oct 6 18:10:49 1981) > ... (inode #184160, mod time Tue Oct 6 18:10:49 1981) > ... (inode #164448, mod time Tue Oct 6 18:10:49 1981) > ... (inode #146528, mod time Tue Oct 6 18:10:49 1981) > ... (inode #126816, mod time Tue Oct 6 18:10:49 1981) > ... (inode #109920, mod time Tue Oct 6 18:10:49 1981) > ... (inode #90208, mod time Tue Oct 6 18:10:49 1981) > ... (inode #74576, mod time Tue Oct 6 18:10:49 1981) > ... (inode #72288, mod time Tue Oct 6 18:10:49 1981) > ... (inode #35680, mod time Tue Oct 6 18:10:49 1981) > Clone multiply-claimed blocks? yes > > Illegal block number passed to ext2fs_test_block_bitmap #3449154175 > for multiply claimed block map > Clone multiply-claimed blocks? yes > > Illegal block number passed to ext2fs_test_block_bitmap #3449154175 > for multiply claimed block map > > I'd appreciate any suggestion anyone could give me！ > > 2011/9/19, Larry <[email protected]>: >> you say the e2fsck enters a endless loop, maybe you don't give enough >> time for it. By the way, you'd better attach some logs >> >> On 9/18/11, enqiang zhou <[email protected]> wrote: >>> hi,all >>> >>> We experienced a serious raid problem and OST on the RAID corrupted, it >>> could not be mounted. >>> Dmesg showed message as bellow when I tryed to mount it as ldiskfs, >>> >>> LDISKFS-fs error (device sdd): ldiskfs_check_descriptors: Checksum for >>> group >>> 14208 failed (51136!=40578) >>> LDISKFS-fs: group descriptors corrupted! >>> >>> Then I tryed to repair it using e2fsck but entering a endless loop, e2fsck >>> never stop! And I couldn't mount it as ldiskfs after I sent kill signal to >>> e2fsck. >>> I also tryed some advice found on list, like "tune2fs -O ununit_bg >>> /dev/xxx, >>> then e2fsck", but none could be helpfull. Our lustre version is 1.8.1.1 >>> with >>> e2fsprogs-1.41.10.sun2 >>> Can Mr Andreas Dilger give me some advice? >>> >>> Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks! >>> >>> Best Regards >>> >> > _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
