Thanks a lot, the work around works. -Jon.
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Oleg Drokin <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello! > > Last time I hit this (some years ago), a simple touch > ldiskfs/Module.symvers helped. I don't remember what the issue was or how it > was properly fixed, though. > > Bye, > Oleg > On Oct 2, 2011, at 1:57 PM, Jon Zhu wrote: > > > Hi, Oleg > > > > I encountered the following error while building Lustre 2.1 release on > Redhat 2.1, do you have any idea on this error? > > > > make[1]: *** No rule to make target > `/build/lustre-release/ldiskfs/Module.symvers', needed by `Module.symvers'. > Stop. > > > > > > Full build log : > > .... > > + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-java-repack-jars > > Processing files: lustre-iokit-1.2-201110021351.noarch > > Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.IOpHyP > > + umask 022 > > + cd /build/kernel/rpmbuild/BUILD > > + cd lustre-iokit-1.2 > > + > DOCDIR=/build/kernel/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/lustre-iokit-1.2-201110021351.x86_64/usr/share/doc/lustre-iokit-1.2 > > + export DOCDIR > > + rm -rf > /build/kernel/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/lustre-iokit-1.2-201110021351.x86_64/usr/share/doc/lustre-iokit-1.2 > > + /bin/mkdir -p > /build/kernel/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/lustre-iokit-1.2-201110021351.x86_64/usr/share/doc/lustre-iokit-1.2 > > + cp -pr obdfilter-survey/README.obdfilter-survey > /build/kernel/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/lustre-iokit-1.2-201110021351.x86_64/usr/share/doc/lustre-iokit-1.2 > > + cp -pr ior-survey/README.ior-survey > /build/kernel/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/lustre-iokit-1.2-201110021351.x86_64/usr/share/doc/lustre-iokit-1.2 > > + cp -pr ost-survey/README.ost-survey > /build/kernel/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/lustre-iokit-1.2-201110021351.x86_64/usr/share/doc/lustre-iokit-1.2 > > + cp -pr sgpdd-survey/README.sgpdd-survey > /build/kernel/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/lustre-iokit-1.2-201110021351.x86_64/usr/share/doc/lustre-iokit-1.2 > > + cp -pr > > stats-collect/README.lstats.sh/build/kernel/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/lustre-iokit-1.2-201110021351.x86_64/usr/share/doc/lustre-iokit-1.2 > > + exit 0 > > Provides: lustre-iokit = 1.2 > > Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 > rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 > rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 > > Requires: /bin/bash /bin/sh /usr/bin/perl perl(File::Path) > perl(Getopt::Long) perl(Getopt::Std) perl(POSIX) > > Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files > /build/kernel/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/lustre-iokit-1.2-201110021351.x86_64 > > Wrote: /build/kernel/rpmbuild/SRPMS/lustre-iokit-1.2-201110021351.src.rpm > > Wrote: > /build/kernel/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/lustre-iokit-1.2-201110021351.noarch.rpm > > Executing(%clean): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.0eXePd > > + umask 022 > > + cd /build/kernel/rpmbuild/BUILD > > + cd lustre-iokit-1.2 > > + /bin/rm -rf > /build/kernel/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/lustre-iokit-1.2-201110021351.x86_64 > > + exit 0 > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/lustre-release/lustre-iokit' > > Finished rpms in lustre-iokit > > make[1]: Entering directory `/build/lustre-release' > > make[1]: *** No rule to make target > `/build/lustre-release/ldiskfs/Module.symvers', needed by `Module.symvers'. > Stop. > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/lustre-release' > > make: *** [rpms] Error 2 > > > > > > Thanks, > > -Jon. > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Oleg Drokin <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hello! > > > > There is nothing special, same as rhel6.1: > > unpack the lustre source, run autogen.sh, run configure and provide the > path to the linux kernel source for your distro (need to patch first too), > make. > > > > Bye, > > Oleg > > On Sep 29, 2011, at 11:21 PM, Jon Zhu wrote: > > > > > Hi, Oleg > > > > > > Do we have a procedure on how to build v2.1 GA code on CentOS 5.6 > (xen)? On whamcloud wiki I can only find build v2.1 on RHEL 6.1 or build > v1.8 on CentOS 5.6. > > > > > > BTW, congratulations on the 2.1 release! > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Jon Zhu > > > Sent from Google Mail > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Oleg Drokin <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hwllo~ > > > > > > On Jun 23, 2011, at 9:51 PM, Jon Zhu wrote: > > > > > > > I still got some crash when further run some I/O test with the build, > here's some system message containing call stack info maybe be useful to you > to find the bug: > > > > > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: ------------[ cut here > ]------------ > > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: WARNING: at > kernel/sched.c:7087 __cond_resched_lock+0x8e/0xb0() (Not tainted) > > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: Modules linked in: lustre(U) > lov(U) osc(U) lquota(U) mdc(U) fid(U) fld(U) ksocklnd(U) ptlrpc(U) > obdclass(U) lnet(U) lvfs(U) libcfs(U) ldiskfs(U) sha256_generic cryptd > aes_x86_64 aes_generic cbc dm_crypt autofs4 ipv6 microcode xen_netfront ext4 > mbcache jbd2 xen_blkfront dm_mod [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan] > > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: Pid: 1421, comm: > mount.lustre Not tainted 2.6.32.lustre21 #6 > > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: Call Trace: > > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffff81069c37>] ? > warn_slowpath_common+0x87/0xc0 > > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffff81007671>] ? > __raw_callee_save_xen_save_fl+0x11/0x1e > > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffff81069c8a>] ? > warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 > > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffff810654fe>] ? > __cond_resched_lock+0x8e/0xb0 > > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffff811a53b7>] ? > shrink_dcache_for_umount_subtree+0x187/0x340 > > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffff811a55a6>] ? > shrink_dcache_for_umount+0x36/0x60 > > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffff8118f4ff>] ? > generic_shutdown_super+0x1f/0xe0 > > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffff8118f5f1>] ? > kill_block_super+0x31/0x50 > > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffff811906b5>] ? > deactivate_super+0x85/0xa0 > > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffff811ac5af>] ? > mntput_no_expire+0xbf/0x110 > > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffffa0273f8e>] ? > unlock_mntput+0x3e/0x60 [obdclass] > > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffffa0277a98>] ? > server_kernel_mount+0x268/0xe80 [obdclass] > > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffffa0280d40>] ? > lustre_fill_super+0x0/0x1290 [obdclass] > > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffffa0279070>] ? > lustre_init_lsi+0xd0/0x5b0 [obdclass] > > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffff810ac71d>] ? > lock_release+0xed/0x220 > > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffffa0280fd0>] ? > lustre_fill_super+0x290/0x1290 [obdclass] > > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffff8118ee20>] ? > set_anon_super+0x0/0x110 > > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffffa0280d40>] ? > lustre_fill_super+0x0/0x1290 [obdclass] > > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffff8119035f>] ? > get_sb_nodev+0x5f/0xa0 > > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffffa0272885>] ? > lustre_get_sb+0x25/0x30 [obdclass] > > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffff8118ffbb>] ? > vfs_kern_mount+0x7b/0x1b0 > > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffff81190162>] ? > do_kern_mount+0x52/0x130 > > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffff811ae647>] ? > do_mount+0x2e7/0x870 > > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffff811aec60>] ? > sys_mount+0x90/0xe0 > > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: [<ffffffff8100b132>] ? > system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b > > > > Jun 23 21:46:12 ip-10-112-59-173 kernel: ---[ end trace > a8fb737c71bfba13 ]--- > > > > > > This is not a crash, it's just a warning about scheduling in > inappropriate context I guess, but the kernel will continue to work. > > > Interesting that I have never seen anything like that in rhel5 xen > kernels, perhaps it's something with rhel6.1 xen? > > > > > > Bye, > > > Oleg > > > -- > > > Oleg Drokin > > > Senior Software Engineer > > > Whamcloud, Inc. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Oleg Drokin > > Senior Software Engineer > > Whamcloud, Inc. > > > > > > -- > Oleg Drokin > Senior Software Engineer > Whamcloud, Inc. > >
_______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
