On 03/20/2012 02:42 PM, Samuel Aparicio wrote: > Thanks for this. > > we have zero experience of patching lustre 1.8.7 against newer kernels, > are there any known pitfalls we should avoid.
I just completed a (completely untested at the moment) build of 2.6.32.59.scalable with 1.8.7 patches. We'll do some testing here first, but if it looks like it works well, we'll put a pointer to the RPM. Or if you want to risk your dog biting you while your servers possibly exploding, strafing your data center with untold numbers of bits, and a diskful or two of lost metadata, I'd be happy to make it available before our testing (we don't care if we lose data on our test rigs) begins. Regards, Joe -- Joseph Landman, Ph.D Founder and CEO Scalable Informatics Inc. email: [email protected] web : http://scalableinformatics.com http://scalableinformatics.com/sicluster phone: +1 734 786 8423 x121 fax : +1 866 888 3112 cell : +1 734 612 4615 _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
