Thanks for a quick reply Andreas. I slightly misunderstood the lustre release process and thought that the next stable/production version is 2.2
I am then interested in the experience of people running Lustre 2.1 Cheers Wojciech On 9 June 2012 21:52, Andreas Dilger <[email protected]> wrote: > I think you'll find that there are not yet (m)any production deployments of > 2.2. There are a number of production 2.1 deployments, and this is the > current maintenance stream from Whamcloud. > > Cheers, Andreas > > On 2012-06-09, at 14:33, Wojciech Turek <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I am building a 1.5PB storage system which will employ Lustre as the >> main file system. The storage system will be extended at the later >> stage beyond 2PB. I am considering using Lustre 2.2 for production >> environment. This Lustre storage system will replace our older 300TB >> system which is currently running Lustre 1.8.8. I am quite happy with >> lustre 1.8.8 however for the new system Lustre 2.2 seem to be a better >> match. The storage system will be attached to a university wide >> cluster (800 nodes), hence there will be quite a large range of >> applications using the filesystem. Could people with production >> deployments of Lustre 2.2 share their experience please? >> >> >> -- >> Wojciech Turek >> _______________________________________________ >> Lustre-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
