On 2012-09-19, at 9:36 PM, Jason Brooks wrote: > Now that the getfattr operation is done, here are the specs: > > the mds filesystem (mounted as type ldiskfs) has 7.7 gigabytes in use. > > however, the getfattr operation produced an ascii file that is 20 gigabytes > in size. > > is this reasonable?
Depends on what you are storing in xattrs and striping. The MDS files have no data in them, so tar will only store the pathname and POSIX attributes. The xattr data will have at least 96 bytes of data * 2 for asciification + any additional data you are storing for ACLs or user xattrs. Cheers, Andreas > On Sep 19, 2012, at 10:06 AM, Jason Brooks wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I am running a file-level backup of an 1.8 mds system. At the moment, I am >> running the getfattr command as mentioned on page 15-3 in the lustre fs >> manual. The biggest thing i a noticing, is that the attributes are as large >> or larger than the actual filesystem. I expect that when converting bits to >> ascii data, the amount of space used will increase. The question though is >> "how much"? It doesn't seem reasonable for the bits to inflate THAT much. >> >> --jason >> >> >> Jason Brooks >> 971-238-3924 >> [email protected] >> Oregon Health Sciences University >> Center for Spoken Language Understanding >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Lustre-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > > Jason Brooks > 971-238-3924 > [email protected] > Oregon Health Sciences University > Center for Spoken Language Understanding > > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Whamcloud, Inc. Principal Lustre Engineer http://www.whamcloud.com/ _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
