I would check to make sure your ldev.conf file is set up with the lustre-ost0 and host name properly.

Scott

On 10/8/2013 10:40 AM, Anjana Kar wrote:
The git checkout was on Sep. 20. Was the patch before or after?

The zpool create command successfully creates a raidz2 pool, and mkfs.lustre
does not complain, but

[root@cajal kar]# zpool list
NAME          SIZE  ALLOC   FREE    CAP  DEDUP  HEALTH  ALTROOT
lustre-ost0  36.2T  2.24M  36.2T     0%  1.00x  ONLINE  -

[root@cajal kar]# /usr/sbin/mkfs.lustre --fsname=cajalfs --ost
--backfstype=zfs --index=0 --mgsnode=10.10.101.171@o2ib lustre-ost0

[root@cajal kar]# /sbin/service lustre start lustre-ost0
lustre-ost0 is not a valid lustre label on this node

I think we'll be splitting up the MDS and OSTs on 2 nodes as some of you
said
there could be other issues down the road, but thanks for all the good
suggestions.

-Anjana

On 10/07/2013 07:24 PM, Ned Bass wrote:
I'm guessing your git checkout doesn't include this commit:

* 010a78e Revert "LU-3682 tunefs: prevent tunefs running on a mounted device"

It looks like the LU-3682 patch introduced a bug that could cause your issue,
so its reverted in the latest master.

Ned

On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 04:54:13PM -0400, Anjana Kar wrote:
On 10/07/2013 04:27 PM, Ned Bass wrote:
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 02:23:32PM -0400, Anjana Kar wrote:
Here is the exact command used to create a raidz2 pool with 8+2 drives,
followed by the error messages:

mkfs.lustre --fsname=cajalfs --reformat --ost --backfstype=zfs
--index=0 --mgsnode=10.10.101.171@o2ib lustre-ost0/ost0 raidz2
/dev/sda /dev/sdc /dev/sde /dev/sdg /dev/sdi /dev/sdk /dev/sdm
/dev/sdo /dev/sdq /dev/sds

mkfs.lustre FATAL: Invalid filesystem name /dev/sds
It seems that either the version of mkfs.lustre you are using has a
parsing bug, or there was some sort of syntax error in the actual
command entered.  If you are certain your command line is free from
errors, please post the version of lustre you are using, or report the
bug in the Lustre issue tracker.

Thanks,
Ned
For building this server, I followed steps from the walk-thru-build*
for Centos 6.4,
and added --with-spl and --with-zfs when configuring lustre..
*https://wiki.hpdd.intel.com/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=8126821

spl and zfs modules were installed from source for the lustre 2.4 kernel
2.6.32.358.18.1.el6_lustre2.4

Device sds appears to be valid, but I will try issuing the command
using by-path
names..

-Anjana

_______________________________________________
Lustre-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss



Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
Lustre-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss

Reply via email to