This probably belongs on the Lustre mailing list. Regardless, I don't think you want to do that (do you?). It'll prevent any client side caching, and more importantly, I don't think it's a case that's been tested/optimized. What're you trying to acheive?
Also, just curious, where's the CPU time being spent? What process and/or kernel thread? What are the top entries listed when you run "perf top"? -- Cheers, Prakash On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 12:53:44PM +0100, Andrew Holway wrote: > Hello, > > I have just setup a "toy" lustre setup using this guide here: > http://zfsonlinux.org/lustre and have this process chewing 100% cpu. > > sh -c echo 0 >> /proc/fs/lustre/llite/lustre-ffff88006b0c7c00/max_cached_mb > > Until I get something more beasty I am using my desktop machine with > KVM. Using standard Centos 6.4 with latest kernel. (2.6.32-358.23.2). > my machine has 2GB ram > > Any ideas? > > Thanks, > > Andrew > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
