Ok, but let's take for example Lustre 2.7

RPMs for Lustre 2.7 published on the web are ~ 9 months ago.
I guess that in the meantime several problems were fixed.
And these fixes are available only to Intel customers (I guess there are some newer rpms available to them) and will never be available to the rest of community.


Did I get it right ?


Thanks, Massimo



On 04/12/2015 19:46, Mohr Jr, Richard Frank (Rick Mohr) wrote:

On Dec 4, 2015, at 12:41 PM, Massimo Sgaravatto <[email protected]> 
wrote:

Thanks Rick for this useful summary !

What is not clear to me if maintenance releases will eventually be available 
again or if people running production systems will have to choose among:

1) Buy Intel support contract
2) Move to another filesystem


First, keep in mind that just because there is not an official maintenance 
release does not necessarily mean that the latest feature release is wildly 
unstable.  There is a significant amount of testing that is performed for each 
Lustre release, and there are a lot of people using Lustre in production who 
have a vested interest in making sure Lustre will work.  The lack of a 
maintenance release should not cause you to immediately jump ship for another 
file system.  IMHO, if you need a free scalable parallel file system, Lustre is 
still your best choice.

With that being said, I wish I could give you a clearer picture of where Lustre 
maintenance releases are headed.  That is a question I am also very interested 
in.  Maybe we will see option #3: Community members publish lists of patches 
they are running in production.  If a large site is running a Lustre 2.7 file 
system and has applied a set of patches they think makes it sufficiently 
stable, maybe small sites could use Lustre 2.7.0 + (list_of_big_site_patches) 
as an informal 2.7.1 release.

The balance between features and stability is a complex topic, but it is one 
that Lustre developers care about.  For a recent thread on this topic, take a 
look at:

http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-devel-lustre.org/2015-November/002767.html

--
Rick Mohr
Senior HPC System Administrator
National Institute for Computational Sciences
http://www.nics.tennessee.edu


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
lustre-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org

Reply via email to