LLNL has always in the past upgraded the servers first.

Chris

On 06/22/2016 09:01 AM, E.S. Rosenberg wrote:
> I always understood the recommendation was to update the clients (and
> LNET Routers) before the servers and not the other way around?
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 1:16 AM, Mohr Jr, Richard Frank (Rick Mohr)
> <rm...@utk.edu <mailto:rm...@utk.edu>> wrote:
> 
> 
>     > On Jun 20, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Jessica Otey <jo...@nrao.edu 
> <mailto:jo...@nrao.edu>> wrote:
>     >
>     > All,
>     > I am in the process of preparing to upgrade a production lustre system 
> running 1.8.9 to 2.4.3.
>     > This current system has 2 lnet routers.
>     > Our plan is to perform the upgrade in 2 stages:
>     > 1) Upgrade the MDS and OSSes to 2.4.3, leaving clients in 1.8.9.
>     > 2) Upgrade all clients to 2.4.3 (thus allowing the entire system to be 
> subsequently updated to 2.5 and beyond)
>     >
>     > The problem is that I can't seem to locate any information about the 
> version requirements (if any) for lnet routers. Does the lnet router have to 
> be the same as mds, or the same as the clients? Or both?
> 
>     The LNet routers do not need to be the same as either the servers or
>     the clients as far as I know.  I don’t know if there is any specific
>     compatibility matrix for LNet versions, but if you are mainly
>     dealing with 1.8.9 and 2.4.3, I think either version would be fine. 
>     With that being said, I usually try to keep my LNet routers and
>     Lustre servers at the same version.  If you are going to take down
>     your servers to upgrade to 2.4.3, you may as well just upgrade the
>     two LNet routers while you are at it.  The clients can then be
>     upgraded later like you listed in your plan.
> 
>     --
>     Rick Mohr
>     Senior HPC System Administrator
>     National Institute for Computational Sciences
>     http://www.nics.tennessee.edu
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     lustre-discuss mailing list
>     lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org <mailto:lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org>
>     http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lustre-discuss mailing list
> lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
> 

_______________________________________________
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org

Reply via email to