Shawn,

Flow control is configured and these connections are all on the same 40g subnet and all directly connected to the same switch.

I'm a little new with using lnet_selftest, but as I run it 1:1, I do see the dropped packets go up on the client node pretty significantly when I run it. The node I set for server does not drop any packets.

Brian Andrus


On 12/5/2017 9:20 AM, Shawn Hall wrote:
Hi Brian,

Do you have flow control configured on all ports that are on the network path? Lustre has a tendency to cause packet losses in ways that performance testing tools don’t because of the N to 1 packet flows, so flow control is often necessary. Lnet_selftest should replicate this behavior.

Is there a point in the network path where the link bandwidth changes (e.g. 40 GbE down to 10 GbE, or 2x40 GbE down to 1x40 GbE)? That will commonly be the biggest point of loss if flow control isn’t doing its job.

Shawn

On 12/5/17, 11:49 AM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of jongwoo...@naver.com" <lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org on behalf of jongwoo...@naver.com> wrote:

Did you check your connection with iperf and iperf3 in TCP bandwidth? in that case, these tools cannot find out packet drops.

Try checking out your block device backend responsibility with benchmark tools like vdbench or bonnie++. Sometimes bad block device causes incorrect data transfer.

-----Original Message-----
From: &quot;Brian Andrus&quot;<toomuc...@gmail.com>
To: "lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org"<lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org>;
Cc:
Sent: 2017-12-06 (수) 01:38:04
Subject: [lustre-discuss] lustre causing dropped packets

All,

I have a small setup I am testing (1 MGS, 2 OSS) that is connected via
40G ethernet.

I notice that when I run anything that writes to the lustre filesystem
causes dropped packets. Reads do not seem to cause this. I have also
tested the network (iperf, iperf3, general traffic) with no dropped packets.

Is there something with writes that can cause dropped packets?


Brian Andrus

_______________________________________________
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org <mailto:lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org>
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
_______________________________________________
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org <mailto:lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org>
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org



*Disclaimer*

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast Ltd, an innovator in Software as a Service (SaaS) for business.


_______________________________________________
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org

Reply via email to