On 4/24/18 2:11 AM, Jones, Peter A wrote: > We’ll be adding support for RHEL 7.5 in the upcoming 2.10.4 release. Note > that 2.9.59 is not a fully qualified release and is just a testing tag during > the 2.10 release cycle (that is the case for any version where y>50 for > version x.y.z) yes I was using 2.9.59 because it was fixing a bug on data corruption. thanks
> > > > On 2018-04-23, 7:08 PM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Riccardo Veraldi" > <lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org on behalf of > riccardo.vera...@cnaf.infn.it> wrote: > >> I tried older client 2.9.59 and still have the same problem. >> I think there may be a problem with RHEL75. >> Anyone is using Lustre client 2.10.* on RHEL75 ? >> thank you >> >> Rick >> >> >> On 4/23/18 6:39 PM, Riccardo Veraldi wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I upgraded some of my clients to RHEL75 and Lustre 2.10.3 >>> >>> Now I can mount all my lustre FS which are 2.9.0 and older (down to 2.4 >>> ) but I cannot see the directories. >>> >>> ls: reading directory /lfs01: Not a direcory >>> total 0 >>> >>> on another client with Lustre 2.10.1 I can mount and use the filesytem >>> from server 2.9.0 and older. >>> >>> Am I reaching a compatibility issue trying to mount 2.9.0 and older from >>> a 2.10.3 client ? >>> >>> thank you >>> >>> >>> Rick >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> lustre-discuss mailing list >>> lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org >>> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lustre-discuss mailing list >> lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org >> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org _______________________________________________ lustre-discuss mailing list lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
