On 10/16/18 5:54 AM, Peter Jones wrote:
Have you tried running 2.10.5 on a RHEL6 client?

hello, sorry I did not do that but I think it is my next option.


On 2018-10-16, 2:13 AM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Riccardo Veraldi" 
<[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> 
wrote:

     On 10/16/18 2:08 AM, George Melikov wrote:
     > Please post your benchmark method.
my benchmark method is by using bbcp. lustre clients 2.10.5 on RHEL7 are fast (1.1GB/s) while RHEL6 clients
     using 2.8.0 perform very poorly (2MB/s)
>
     > ____________________________________
     > Sincerely,
     > George Melikov,
     > Tel. 7-915-278-39-36
     > Skype: georgemelikov
     >
     >
     > 16.10.2018, 12:03, "Riccardo Veraldi" <[email protected]>:
     >> On 10/15/18 4:59 PM, Alexander I Kulyavtsev wrote:
     >>>   You can do a quick check with 2.10.5 client by mounting lustre on 
MDS if you do not have free node to install 2.10.5 client.
     >>>
     >>>   Do you have lnet configured with IB or 10GE? LNet defaults to tcp if 
not set. Can it be you are connected through slow management network?
     >>>
     >>>   Alex.
     >> hi, my lnet is configured with both IB and 10GE. it is using IB I
     >> verified it and anyway performance is very slow even if it where just
     >> using tcp on 10GE
     >>
     >> since I only get 2MB/s
     >>
     >> thanks
     >>
     >>>   On 10/15/18, 6:41 PM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Riccardo Veraldi" 
<[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
     >>>
     >>>        Hello,
     >>>
     >>>        I have a new Lustre FS version 2.10.5. 18 OSTs 18TB each on 3 
OSSes.
     >>>
     >>>        I noticed very slow performances couple of MB/sec when RHEL6 
Lustre
     >>>        clients 2.8.0 are writing to the fielsystem.
     >>>
     >>>        Could it be a Lustre version problem server vs client ?
     >>>
     >>>        I have no errors either on server or client side that can debug 
it
     >>>        further...
     >>>
     >>>        thanks
     >>>
     >>>        Rick
     >>>
     >>>        _______________________________________________
     >>>        lustre-discuss mailing list
     >>>        [email protected]
     >>>        
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.lustre.org_listinfo.cgi_lustre-2Ddiscuss-2Dlustre.org&d=DwIGaQ&c=gRgGjJ3BkIsb5y6s49QqsA&r=23V5nhLj03jeTboyg6QveA&m=ABK5Lf73Df1JeZ-ryuh87ds4a5qoTk1gcookZ1auOuU&s=3gW-gvhmg4r0oQv3isx4u1P2TBHOzyDeFC-MZoxR68Y&e=
     >> _______________________________________________
     >> lustre-discuss mailing list
     >> [email protected]
     >> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
_______________________________________________
     lustre-discuss mailing list
     [email protected]
     http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org

_______________________________________________
lustre-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org

Reply via email to