On 3/19/19 11:46 AM, Degremont, Aurelien wrote:
Also, if you’re not using Lustre 2.11 or 2.12, do not forget
dnodesize=auto and recordsize=1M for OST
zfs set dnodesize=auto mdt0
zfs set dnodesize=auto ostX
https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-8342
good point, thank you
(useful for 2.10 LTS. Automatically done by Lustre for 2.11+)
*De : *lustre-discuss <lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org> au nom
de "Carlson, Timothy S" <timothy.carl...@pnnl.gov>
*Date : *mercredi 13 mars 2019 à 23:07
*À : *Riccardo Veraldi <riccardo.vera...@cnaf.infn.it>, Kurt Strosahl
<stros...@jlab.org>, "lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org"
<lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org>
*Objet : *Re: [lustre-discuss] ZFS tuning for MDT/MGS
+1 on
options zfs zfs_prefetch_disable=1
Might not be as critical now, but that was a must-have on Lustre 2.5.x
Tim
*From:* lustre-discuss <lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org> *On
Behalf Of *Riccardo Veraldi
*Sent:* Wednesday, March 13, 2019 3:00 PM
*To:* Kurt Strosahl <stros...@jlab.org>; lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
*Subject:* Re: [lustre-discuss] ZFS tuning for MDT/MGS
these are the zfs settings I use on my MDSes
zfs set mountpoint=none mdt0
zfs set sync=disabled mdt0
zfs set atime=off amdt0
zfs set redundant_metadata=most mdt0
zfs set xattr=sa mdt0
if youor MDT partition is on a 4KB sector disk then you can use
ashift=12 when you create the filesystem but zfs is pretty smart and
in my case it recognized it automatically and used ashift=12
automatically.
also here are the zfs kernel modules parameters i use to ahve better
performance. I use it on both MDS and OSSes
options zfs zfs_prefetch_disable=1
options zfs zfs_txg_history=120
options zfs metaslab_debug_unload=1
#
options zfs zfs_vdev_scheduler=deadline
options zfs zfs_vdev_async_write_active_min_dirty_percent=20
#
options zfs zfs_vdev_scrub_min_active=48
options zfs zfs_vdev_scrub_max_active=128
#options zfs zfs_vdev_sync_write_min_active=64
#options zfs zfs_vdev_sync_write_max_active=128
#
options zfs zfs_vdev_sync_write_min_active=8
options zfs zfs_vdev_sync_write_max_active=32
options zfs zfs_vdev_sync_read_min_active=8
options zfs zfs_vdev_sync_read_max_active=32
options zfs zfs_vdev_async_read_min_active=8
options zfs zfs_vdev_async_read_max_active=32
options zfs zfs_top_maxinflight=320
options zfs zfs_txg_timeout=30
options zfs zfs_dirty_data_max_percent=40
options zfs zfs_vdev_async_write_min_active=8
options zfs zfs_vdev_async_write_max_active=32
some people may disagree with me anyway after years of trying
different options I reached this stable configuration.
then there are a bunch of other important Lustre level optimizations
that you can do if you are looking for performance increase.
Cheers
Rick
On 3/13/19 11:44 AM, Kurt Strosahl wrote:
Good Afternoon,
I'm reviewing the zfs parameters for a new metadata system and
I was looking to see if anyone had examples (good or bad) of zfs
parameters? I'm assuming that the MDT won't benefit from a
recordsize of 1MB, and I've already set the ashift to 12. I'm
using an MDT/MGS made up of a stripe across mirrored ssds.
w/r,
Kurt
_______________________________________________
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org <mailto:lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org>
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
_______________________________________________
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
_______________________________________________
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org