Likely you're seeing the discrepancy as a result of precreated objects. Cheers
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019, 2:58 AM Youssef Eldakar <[email protected]> wrote: > For one Lustre filesystem, inode count in the summary is notably less than > what the individual OST inode counts would add up to: > > # lfs df -i /lfs01 > UUID Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on > lustrefs-MDT0000_UUID 2402287616 46560885 2355726731 2% > /share/lfs01[MDT:0] > lustrefs-OST0001_UUID 24117248 22883788 1233460 95% > /share/lfs01[OST:1] > lustrefs-OST0003_UUID 24117248 22903308 1213940 95% > /share/lfs01[OST:3] > lustrefs-OST0004_UUID 24117248 22895442 1221806 95% > /share/lfs01[OST:4] > lustrefs-OST0006_UUID 24117248 22890201 1227047 95% > /share/lfs01[OST:6] > > filesystem_summary: 51457138 46560885 4896253 90% /share/lfs01 > > On another filesystem, this is not the case: > > # lfs df -i /lfs02 > UUID Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on > lustrefs-MDT0000_UUID 1288503296 19222318 1269280978 1% > /share/lfs02[MDT:0] > lustrefs-OST0001_UUID 24117248 5942156 18175092 25% > /share/lfs02[OST:1] > lustrefs-OST0002_UUID 24117248 5816469 18300779 24% > /share/lfs02[OST:2] > lustrefs-OST0003_UUID 24117248 5982962 18134286 25% > /share/lfs02[OST:3] > > filesystem_summary: 73832475 19222318 54610157 26% /share/lfs02 > > In fact, in the latter case, the whole is slightly greater than the sum of > its parts. > > Any pointers regarding where I would look for an explanation would be > appreciated. > > Youssef Eldakar > Bibliotheca Alexandrina > _______________________________________________ > lustre-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org >
_______________________________________________ lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
