We run one OST per OSS and each OST is ~580TB. Lustre 2.8 or 2.10, ZFS 0.7.
On 10/8/19 10:50 AM, Carlson, Timothy S wrote: I’ve been running 100->200TB OSTs making up small petabyte file systems for the last 4 or 5 years with no pain. Lustre 2.5.x through current generation. Plenty of ZFS rebuilds when I ran across a set of bad disks that went fine. From: lustre-discuss <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]> On Behalf Of [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2019 10:43 AM To: lustre-discuss <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [lustre-discuss] Is it a good practice to use big OST? Hi All We recently purchased new storage hardware, and that gives us the options of creating big zpools for OSTs (>100TB per OST), I am wondering if anyone has any experience of using big OSTs and if that would impact the performance of lustre in a good or bad way? Any comments or suggestions are appreciated! Cheers! ________________________________ -Wenjing [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> _______________________________________________ lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
_______________________________________________ lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
