The best thing to do is file a LUDOC ticket at https://jira.whamcloud.com/ and push a fix patch against the doc/lustre-manual repo at https://review.whamcloud.com/ so the minor error can be fixed.
Cheers, Andreas > On Nov 13, 2020, at 11:31, Patrick Shopbell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello all, > Trivial check: In section 17.2 of the Lustre manual, under major > release upgrades, this is noted as step 14: > >> Introduced in Lustre 2.7 >> >> (Optional) If you are upgrading from a release before Lustre 2.7, to enable >> OST FIDs to also store the OST index (to improve reliability of LFSCK and >> debug messages), after the OSTs are mounted run once on each OSS: >> >> oss# lctl set_param osd-ldiskfs.*.osd_index_in_idif=1 > > We recently went from Lustre 2.5 to 2.8 (on our way to 2.12), and > I would like to add the above setting, now that we have been running > for a few weeks. However, I think it should actually be: > > oss# lctl set_param osd-ldiskfs.*.index_in_idif=1 > > Could someone confirm? I'm far from a pro on all of the various > Lustre variables. > > Thanks a lot. > Patrick > > -- > *--------------------------------------------------------------------* > | Patrick Shopbell Department of Astronomy | > | [email protected] Mail Code 249-17 | > | (626) 395-4097 California Institute of Technology | > | (626) 568-9352 (FAX) Pasadena, CA 91125 | > | WWW: http://www.astro.caltech.edu/~pls/ | > *--------------------------------------------------------------------* > > _______________________________________________ > lustre-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org _______________________________________________ lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
