Thanks for the clarification. :)
Sid Young M: 0458 396300 W: https://off-grid-engineering.com W: ( <https://z900collector.wordpress.com/restoration/>personal) https://sidyoung.com/ On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 4:35 PM Indivar Nair <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Sid, > > 1. > -- You don't need a Cluster/Virtual IP for Lustre. Only the MGT, MDT and > OST volumes need to be failed over. > When these volumes are failed over to the other server, all the > components of the Lustre file system are informed about this failover, and > they will then continue accessing these volumes using the IP of the > failover server. > > 2. > -- No. MGS IP should also be in the same network(s) as MDS and OSS. > > If you are using IML for installation and management of Lustre, then this > should be on a different network (for example, your 10G network (or a 1G > network)). > > Regards, > > > Indivar Nair > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 10:29 AM Sid Young <[email protected]> wrote: > >> G'day all, >> >> I'm trying to get my head around configuring a new Lustre 2.12.6 cluster >> on Centos 7.9, in particular the correct IP(s) for the MGS. >> >> In a pacemaker based MDS cluster, when I define the IP for the HA, is >> that the same IP used when referencing the MGS, or is the MGS IP only >> specified by using the IP of both the MDS servers (assume dual MDS HA >> cluster here)? >> >> And, if I have a 100G ethernet network (for RoCE) for Lustre usage and a >> 10G network for server access is the MGS IP based around the 100G network >> or my 10G network? >> >> Any help appreciated :) >> >> Sid Young >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lustre-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org >> >
_______________________________________________ lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
