I see that you are using dkms version of lustre module.
I would check that, it is possible that the dkms build trigger a client-only
build of Lustre ? (missing deps, etc...)
Could you check the list of Lustre modules built and installed by dkms between
the 2 working OSSes and the 4 others?
Aurélien
Le 26/04/2021 18:27, « Steve Thompson » <s...@vgersoft.com> a écrit :
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the
content is safe.
On Mon, 26 Apr 2021, Degremont, Aurelien wrote:
> Could you provide more debugging information, like 'rpm -qa | grep
lustre' on both hosts?
> The actual mount command, etc...
>
> There must be something different, as the result is different...
Yes, I believe that something must be different; I just cannot find it. I
now have six OST systems. All were installed the same way; two work fine
and four do not. The rpm list:
# rpm -qa | grep lustre
lustre-osd-zfs-mount-2.12.6-1.el7.x86_64
lustre-2.12.6-1.el7.x86_64
lustre-zfs-dkms-2.12.6-1.el7.noarch
# the mount command example:
# grep lustre /etc/fstab
fs1/ost1 /mnt/fs1/ost1 lustre defaults,_netdev_ 0 0
and all are the same on all six systems. I currently have ZFS 0.8.5
installed, but I have tried with ZFS 0.7.13, and the results are
the same.
Steve
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steve Thompson E-mail: smt AT vgersoft DOT com
Voyager Software LLC Web: http://www DOT vgersoft DOT com
3901 N Charles St VSW Support: support AT vgersoft DOT com
Baltimore MD 21218
"186,282 miles per second: it's not just a good idea, it's the law"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
