Christian, thanks for the hint. Let me review and get back to you if I get with the problem.
On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 3:45 PM Christian Kuntz <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Hugo, > > The autoconf has some detection that should be able to grab the SPL > information for Zfs .8+ source dirs, so you may be able to scrub it out and > let the scripting handle it (you can always double check it's correct by > reading the conf logs). > > Can you forward any configuration errors you are getting? If you're > compiling off of the ZFS sources there were some changes to the header > layout that may be causing a challenge. > > Best, > Christian > > On Thu, May 6, 2021, 1:38 PM <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Send lustre-discuss mailing list submissions to >> [email protected] >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> [email protected] >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> [email protected] >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of lustre-discuss digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. Re: Lustre version 2.14 support for CentOS 7 (Hugo R Hernandez) >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 11:47:44 -0500 >> From: Hugo R Hernandez <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre version 2.14 support for CentOS 7 >> Message-ID: >> < >> cagbbdbhjrrpvatnyhu19yha215xyubmxwst0ol6duv8qs55...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> Morning Lustre Community! >> >> Has anyone experienced any issue when trying to build Lustre 2.14 with ZFS >> 2.0.4 on CentOS7.9 running any of these two kernels: 3.10.0-1160.6.1.el7 >> (tested during release) and 3.10.0-1160.25.1.el7 (latest). Is there any >> 'special recipe' you need to follow for a proper Lustre build from source? >> When we built for 2.10+ we used to use these flags when configuring: >> >> --with-zfs >> --with-zfs-obj >> --with-spl >> --with-spl-obj >> >> but ZFS 2.0.x now includes SPL as part of it as previously they were >> separated packages. >> >> Any hint on how to address this problem? Help is greatly appreciated! >> >> Thanks, >> -Hugo >> >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 12:51 PM Hugo R Hernandez <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > Peter, I have been trying to get 2.14 ready with ZFS 2.0.4 on CentOS 7.9 >> > but I have encountered a couple of issues. This is what I have been >> doing: >> > >> > ZFS: >> > Install dependency packages >> > git clone https://github.com/openzfs/zfs.git >> > git checkout remotes/origin/zfs-2.0-release >> > ./autogen.sh >> > ./configure >> > make && make rpms >> > install libzfs4, zfs-2.0.4, zfs-dksm (have tried also installing >> > kmod-zfs*, libuutil3, libnvpair3, libzpool4) >> > >> > Lustre: >> > git clone git://git.whamcloud.com/fs/lustre-release.git >> > git checkout remotes/origin/b2_14 >> > ./autogen.sh >> > ./configure --enable-ldiskfs --with-zfs --enable-quota --enable-utils >> > --enable-gss --enable-snmp >> --with-zfs-obj=/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.0.4/3.10.0- >> > 1160.24.1.el7.x86_64/x86_64 >> > make <<< here I have linking breaks >> > >> > I get an error like this: >> > >> > fatal error: sys/byteorder.h: No such file or directory >> > #include <sys/byteorder.h> >> > >> > I wondering if I'm doing this on an updated CentOS 7.9 host running >> > kernel 3.10.0-1160.24.1.el7 instead of the one used for testing during >> > release cycle: 3.10.0-1160.6.1.el7. is there something I'm missing or >> > doing wrong in this case? Should I be able to compile then build RPMs >> i.e. >> > using now available 3.10.0-1160.25.1.el7 so we can have happy security >> > folks by using the latest kernel? >> > >> > Please advise. Thanks in advance! >> > >> > -- >> > *Hugo R Hernandez* >> > >> > "Se seus esfor?os foram vistos com indeferen?a, n?o desanime que o sol >> > faze um espectacolo maravilhoso todas as manh?s enquanto a maioria das >> > pessoas ainda est?o dormindo" >> > - An?nimo brasileiro >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 12:01 PM Peter Jones <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> >> Hugo >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 2.14 will likely build/work against centos 7.9 even though that was not >> >> the primary kernel it was tested against >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Peter >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> *From: *lustre-discuss <[email protected]> on >> >> behalf of Hugo R Hernandez via lustre-discuss < >> >> [email protected]> >> >> *Reply-To: *Hugo R Hernandez <[email protected]> >> >> *Date: *Thursday, April 15, 2021 at 8:50 AM >> >> *To: *"[email protected]" < >> [email protected]> >> >> *Subject: *[lustre-discuss] Lustre version 2.14 support for CentOS 7 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Hello there! We have been planning to upgrade Lustre from 2.10+ to >> 2.14, >> >> but we encountered it supports only RHEL 8.3, SLES 15 SP2, and Ubuntu >> >> 20.04. How about RHEL/CentOS 7? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> https://downloads.whamcloud.com/public/lustre/lustre-2.14.0/ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> We can see release 2.13 supports RHEL 7.7 (servers and clients) and >> >> 2.12.9 supports RHEL 7.9. Part of this upgrade is motivated to work >> on a >> >> OST-to-DoM migration but this appears to be possible until 2.13. Our >> >> desire is to use DoM to alleviate with metadata performance due to >> tons of >> >> small files. We want at this point to verify if any 2.13 or 2.14 would >> >> eventually support CentOS 7.9. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks in advance! >> >> >> >> -Hugo >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> "Se seus esfor?os foram vistos com indeferen?a, n?o desanime que o sol >> >> faze um espectacolo maravilhoso todas as manh?s enquanto a maioria das >> >> pessoas ainda est?o dormindo" >> >> >> >> - An?nimo brasileiro >> >> >> > >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: < >> http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20210506/79071bda/attachment-0001.html >> > >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Subject: Digest Footer >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lustre-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> End of lustre-discuss Digest, Vol 182, Issue 6 >> ********************************************** >> > _______________________________________________ > lustre-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org >
_______________________________________________ lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
