Hi,

Me again! I now have a successful build of lustre server with ZFS support, 
thanks all for your help with this. I'm now stuck on getting ldiskfs support to 
work - specifically it requires the kernel-debuginfo and debugsource packages, 
which on Rocky 8.6, don't exist for the kernel I'm building against 
(4.18.0-372.9.1.el8.x86_64). I've installed the only ones that exist, for 
kernel 4.18.0-477.15.1.el8_8 and hackily symlinked it to the current kernel to 
get lustre to build against it, which it does, but then it fails on applying 
patches, which I suppose is not surprising. I assumed that having the e2fsprogs 
devel installed would do the trick but the build is specific in looking in 
/usr/src/kernel and /usr/src/debug/kernel, neither of which have it.

I'd like ldiskfs support as we currently run this fs on the MDT. However, we're 
only doing that because when we put the filesystem in place (which was a while 
ago) I'd read a fair amount warning against using ZFS on MDT due to potential 
performance issues. I've had a trawl through the mailing list and I can't see 
anyone having issues with newer ZFS versions so I guess my question is, is this 
still a thing? I've been planning to move to ZFS at some point anyway and it 
seems like this would be a good opportunity to do so but I thought I'd check 
and see if anyone had any advice.

Thanks in advance
Jon


Jon Marshall

High Performance Computing Specialist



IT and Scientific Computing Team



Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute

Li Ka Shing Centre | Robinson Way | Cambridge | CB2 0RE

Web<http://www.cruk.cam.ac.uk/> | 
Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/cancerresearchuk> | 
Twitter<http://twitter.com/CR_UK>



[Description: CRI Logo]<http://www.cruk.cam.ac.uk/>

_______________________________________________
lustre-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
  • [... Jon Marshall via lustre-discuss
    • ... Peter Bortas via lustre-discuss
    • ... Vicker, Darby J. (JSC-EG111)[Jacobs Technology, Inc.] via lustre-discuss

Reply via email to