Hi Shaun,
Thank you your reply. What you say about Debian 12 is a bit worrying:
"--disable-ldiskfs" - I use ldiskfs on the servers, I hope this isn't relevant
on the clients?
/jan
On 30/09/2023 09:15, Tancheff, Shaun wrote:
I tried Debian 5.10.0-22 kernel and had no issues with tag 2.15.3.
I also checked Debian 12 (6.1.0-10) with gcc 12 and I hit a couple of things:
2.15.3 seems to have some problems in configure
Master needs to disable gss [--disable-gss --disable-gss-keyring]
Lutf fails due to python deprecating Py_SetProgramName()
Several places hit "__write_overflow_field(p_size_field, size)" coming from
OBD_FREE_PTR() which calls memset().
FWIW my client build configure looks like:
./configure --config-cache --disable-server --enable-client
--with-linux=/usr/src/linux-headers-6.1.0-10-amd64 --without-zfs
--disable-ldiskfs --disable-gss --disable-gss-keyring --disable-snmp
--enable-modules
I pushed Lustre fixes for Debian's 6.1 kernel (client):
LU-17161 build: Avoid fortify_memset in OBD_FREE_PTR
LU-17160 build: Use PyConfig_InitPythonConfig 3.11 and later
Regards,
Shaun
On 9/29/23, 11:00 PM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Jan Andersen"
<[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
I have a lustre 2.15.3 cluster and need to add Debian 11 and -12 clients.
This is what I've done so far:
# git clone git://git.whamcloud.com/fs/lustre-release.git
# git checkout 2.15.3
# sh autogen.sh
# ./configure --disable-server
But make fails:
...
make[3]: Entering directory '/usr/src/linux-headers-5.10.0-13-amd64'
CC [M]
/root/Downloads/linux/lustre-release/lnet/klnds/o2iblnd/o2iblnd.o
In file included from /usr/src/linux-source-5.10/include/linux/init.h:5,
from
/usr/src/linux-headers-5.10.0-13-common/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h:15,
from
/usr/src/linux-source-5.10/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h:17,
from
/usr/src/linux-headers-5.10.0-13-common/arch/x86/include/asm/page_types.h:7,
from
/usr/src/linux-headers-5.10.0-13-common/arch/x86/include/asm/page.h:9,
from
/root/Downloads/linux/lustre-release/lnet/klnds/o2iblnd/o2iblnd.c:36:
/usr/src/linux-source-5.10/include/linux/sched/signal.h: In function
‘signal_pending’:
/usr/src/linux-source-5.10/include/linux/sched/signal.h:369:39: error:
‘TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL’ undeclared (first use in this function)
369 | if (unlikely(test_tsk_thread_flag(p, TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL)))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/src/linux-source-5.10/include/linux/compiler.h:78:42: note: in
definition of macro ‘unlikely’
78 | # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
| ^
The system is Debian 11:
# uname -r
5.10.0-13-amd64
# ll /usr/src
total 117916
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Aug 21 09:19 linux-config-5.10/
drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Jul 25 2022
linux-headers-5.10.0-12-amd64/
drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Jul 25 2022
linux-headers-5.10.0-12-common/
drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Jul 25 2022
linux-headers-5.10.0-13-amd64/
drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Jul 25 2022
linux-headers-5.10.0-13-common/
drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Aug 11 09:59
linux-headers-5.10.0-24-amd64/
drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Aug 11 09:59
linux-headers-5.10.0-24-common/
drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Aug 21 09:19
linux-headers-5.10.0-25-amd64/
drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Aug 21 09:19
linux-headers-5.10.0-25-common/
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 Jun 30 2022 linux-kbuild-5.10 ->
../lib/linux-kbuild-5.10
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 161868 Aug 16 21:52 linux-patch-5.10-rt.patch.xz
drwxr-xr-x 25 root root 4096 Jul 14 21:24 linux-source-5.10/
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 120529768 Aug 16 21:52 linux-source-5.10.tar.xz
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jan 30 2023 percona-server/
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 28 Jul 29 2022 vboxhost-6.1.36 ->
/opt/VirtualBox/src/vboxhost
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 Apr 17 19:32 vboxhost-7.0.8 ->
../share/virtualbox/src/vboxhost
Is this yet another case of the kernel sources having to be exactly the
same as the running kernel?
It seems to be a bit difficult to determine whether the source version is
correct or not; I haven't
found a Debian source tree that matches precisely.
/jan
_______________________________________________
lustre-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
_______________________________________________
lustre-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
