We may have a security update that is wrapped up in a kernel upgrade but we may not have tested the lustre upgrade yet to release into our production landscape.
Was curious if it’s possible if there were others in the community that managed their patches and upgrades that didn’t involving upgrading lustre while patching the os kernel. Khoi On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 8:24 AM Laura Hild <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Khoi- > > You could probably back-port to 2.15.3 the specific patch or patches that > give 2.15.4 support for EL8.9 kernels, while leaving out the other fixes in > 2.15.4, but that raises the question of why exactly you don't want those > other fixes but do want the newer kernel. > > -Laura > > > ________________________________________ > Od: lustre-discuss <[email protected]> v imenu Khoi > Mai via lustre-discuss <[email protected]> > Poslano: ponedeljek, 25. marec 2024 13:18 > Za: [email protected] > Zadeva: [lustre-discuss] lustre 2.15.3 > > Is there a pathway to compile and operate lustre version 2.15.3 on linux 8 > > kernel-4.18.0-513.18.1.el8_9.x86_64. Or must we upgrade our lustre package > to 2.15.4 ? > > Thanks, > > Khoi > >
_______________________________________________ lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
