> Thanks, but it wasn't really point - as I said, I don't intend distributing > what I've got, with or without permission. It just struck me as odd that > the edition was so completely "anonymous", and I wondered why. > Tony How about intellectual honesty? RT
> > >> Here are the Broude Bros contacts: >> >> Broude Brothers >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Broude Brothers Limited >> 141 White Oaks Road >> Williamstown, MA 01267 >> >> Dr. Ronald Broude, Dr. Gwen Broude >> Phone: (413) 458-8131 >> (800) 225 3197 >> Fax: (413) 458-5242 >> >> GJC >> >> Date sent: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 14:24:38 -0000 >> To: "Lute Net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> From: "Stewart McCoy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: Re: Falce and unperfect: was: Facsimeles etc. >> >>> Dear Tony, >>> >>> If you wanted, you could probably track down an address for Broude >>> Bros via the Internet. >>> >>> I'm afraid I don't know what the legal situation is in America. We >>> usually rely on Howard Posner's expertise when it comes to legal >>> matters. If I remember right, his last e-mail on this subject seemed to >>> suggest that the situation wasn't absolutely clear. >>> >>> Best wishes, >>> >>> Stewart McCoy. >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Tony Chalkley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: "Lute Net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Stewart McCoy" >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 1:08 PM >>> Subject: Falce and unperfect: was: Facsimeles etc. >>> >>> >>>> I think the same was true of the Quarto editions of Shakespeare. >>>> >>>> Where do Broude Performers' facsimiles fit in to this? I have >>> their >>>> Lachrimae table book (price in ink on the inside cover). Neither >>> the >>>> publisher's name nor a copyright mark appear anywhere in the book. >>> I do not >>>> have any intention of publishing any part of it on Internet - >>> (it's mine >>>> 'cos I paid for it), but if I had, and wanted to ask their >>> permission, I >>>> would find it very difficult as I can't imagine a letter to >>> 'Performers' >>>> Facsimiles, New York' would get there easily. >>>> >>>> Is this a question of US law, or is there a fundamental difference >>> in >>>> policy? >>>> >>>> Tony >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > >
