> I am going to take a risk. There have been comments among us about specific > religious associatians. And specifically a comment that M.O. insulted > Sephardim. Well then, is M.O. an Ashkenazi conducting an internal > confrontation? He says he has Sephardic family, but who knows what that is. > Bear with me. No, the reason for conflagration is simply "MO name brand recognition" at all costs. RT
- Re: State of Lutenet (was Size of the lute world) Matanya Ophee
- Re: State of Lutenet (was Size of the lute world) Michael Thames
- Re: State of Lutenet (was Size of the lute world) Stephan Olbertz
- Re: State of Lutenet (was Size of the lute world) Jon Murphy
- Re: State of Lutenet (was Size of the lute world) Jon Murphy
- Re: State of Lutenet (was Size of the lute world) Bernd Haegemann
- Re: State of Lutenet (was Size of the lute world) Howard Posner
- Re: State of Lutenet (was Size of the lute world) Roman Turovsky
- Re: State of Lutenet (was Size of the lute world) Roman Turovsky
- Re: State of Lutenet (was Size of the lute world) Roman Turovsky
- Re: State of Lutenet (was Size of the lute world) Roman Turovsky
- Re: State of Lutenet (was Size of the lute world) Roman Turovsky
- Re: State of Lutenet (was Size of the lute world) Jon Murphy
- Re: State of Lutenet (was Size of the lute world) Stewart McCoy
- Re: State of Lutenet (was Size of the lute world) Vance Wood
- Re: State of Lutenet (was Size of the lute world) Michael Thames
- Re: State of Lutenet (was Size of the lute world) Howard Posner
- Re: State of Lutenet (was Size of the lute world) Bernd Haegemann
- Re: State of Lutenet (was Size of the lute world) arielabramovich
- Re: State of Lutenet (was Size of the lute world) arielabramovich
- Re: State of Lutenet (was Size of the lute world) Michael Thames
