Hi Stewart, your archives are nearly as good as those of the KGB and CIA
together :-) 

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Stewart McCoy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoy� : mercredi 9 juin 2004 15:48
� : Lute Net
Objet : Lute Society was Re: N*geria Scams


Dear Arthur,

I have done a quick search through my computer archives, and the
only references I can find to the "Lute Society of Great Britain"
are these:

1) Me in a message to this list on 11th July 2000: "I wrote
something similar to what I have to say here for the News Magazine
of the Lute Society of Great Britain, but I cannot put my hands on
the relevant issue."

2) Stuart Mayes in a message sent to this list by Roman Turovsky on
18th September 2001: "As a long-standing member of the Lute Society
of Great Britain, I have
long been fascinated with the life and works of the English Lute
composer/performer John Danyel (1564-1626), brother of Samuel of
'Delia' fame."

3) Monica Hall writing to the Spanish Lute List ("Vihuelista") on
3rd May 2000, when she wrote: "Soy miembro de la 'Lute Society of
Great Britain' ."

4) Chris Goodwin's Lute Society message dated 7th January 2004 about
the Nigerian scam. After the information on the scam there is
mention of the "Lute Society of Great Britain" in connection with
concerts to be given by Ben Salfield.

My guess is that you read about the "Lute Society of Great Britain"
in this message from Chris Goodwin, because we have been discussing
recently what Chris had to say about the Nigerian scam. (This would
make the title of this thread more appropriate than perhaps you had
imagined. :-)  )

It makes sense to refer to the Lute Society as British, if one is
mentioning it alongside other lute societies. That's probably why I
used the phrase back in 2000, to avoid confusion with the American
Lute Society. I agree with you that the Lute Society set up by Diana
Poulton and Ian Harwood in the 1950s was the first lute society, and
was created for everone in the world, no matter which country they
happen to come from.

Like you I prefer to save the phrase "The Lute Society" for the
British
lute society. There was some confusion a while ago, when John
Buckman used the phrase "Lute Society" for his lute website, but I
can't remember how this was resolved. At least one subscriber to
this list refers to the list as the "lute society", which could be
misleading. I prefer "Lute Net" or "Lute List".

There is a parallel situation with the Viola da Gamba Society, which
was started 1948. For many
years they have referred to themselves as "The Viola da Gamba
Society of Great Britain". At least that's what you will see on the
front of their Newsletter and in their "Sup Pubs" (music
publications). They describe their journal, _Chelys_, as "The
Journal of the Viola da Gamba Society" [no "Great Britain"]. Their
website doesn't mention "Great Britain" either.

I don't suppose these things matter too much. The main thing is to
be clear about who is who.

All the best,

Stewart.



<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "LUTE NET" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 1:30 AM
Subject: Lute Society was Re: N*geria Scams


> Yes, I saw the designation "Lute Society of Great Britiain" from
someone on
> this list, and thought the Society had altered its name.  I can't
remember
> who it was, but it was someone I thought would be in a position to
know.
>
> When I wrote to Chris, I asked. He said there had been no change.
I too
> see no reason to change, since the Lute Society was the first on
the scene
> and surely has always intended to serve the whole lute world.  And
the
> officers and administrator have been doing a commendable job for
all of us.
> And back in the 1950s, who would have thought there would be so
many
> lutenists that national societies would be necessary.
>
> The most localized society is surely the Dutch Lute Society.
Nearly 100%
> of the some 200 members live in Holland.  The last time I checked,
sveral
> years ago, only 10 persons lived outside of Holland.  Could that
mean that
> the Netherlands has more lutenists per square mile than any other
country
> in the Western World?<g>
>
> arthur.
> =======Simon said======================
>   Just a small correction to something Arthur said:
>
> "The message was a genuine warning from Chris Goodwin
(lutesocol.com),
> administrator of the Lute Society of Great Britain (as they now
call
> themselves)."
>
> In fact the Lute Society based in the UK, of which Chris Goodwin
is
> secretary, is called just that: the Lute Society, plain and
simple, and has
> no plans to change the name.  In fact it is especially appropriate
since,
> as Chris tells me, more than 50% of members live overseas.
>
>         Simon Lambert
>         Oxford, England
> <>
>
>




Reply via email to