--- Roman Turovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribi�: 
> > --- Roman Turovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> escribi??> > I am questioning a
> > rather dubious methodological
> >>> approach, and I have stated my reasons for
> >> considering
> >>> it as such. If that reminds you of MO's atacks,
> it
> >> is
> >>> your privilege to believe so.
> >> If you accept E.7XXXX as a vihuela there is no
> >> reason not to accept Diaz.
> > 
> > 
> > I accept the E.0748 as a six-course vihuela; I
> accept
> > the Dias instrument for what it may be: either a
> > five-course guitar or a five course-vihuela, both
> > options can be defended. I prefer (and stress
> > "prefer") to consider it a guitar taking into
> account
> > the historical and musical context at the time it
> was
> > made. If you prefer to consider it a five-course
> > vihuela I would have no qualms about that. What I
> find
> > objectionable is to assert that it was a
> six-course
> > vihuela without adequate support to back such a
> claim.
> This all boils down to partisan defense of friends,
> rather than intellectual
> evenhandedness. It's perfectly acceptable, and I'm
> not immune to this
> myself.
> RT
> 


Being aware that an attack ad hominem is the last
resource when there are no academic arguments to
defend a case, I thank you for this tacit admission.

Now, if you are prepared to back the opinion you state
with adequate evidence, I will be only to happy to
continue the discussion. Otherwise you are welcome to
proclaim your personal opinions to whomsoever will be
willing to listen; I shall not be interested. 

With best regards,
Antonio

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Informaci�n de Estados Unidos y Am�rica Latina, en Yahoo! Noticias.
Vis�tanos en http://noticias.espanol.yahoo.com



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to