>
> Roman, I'm thinking of making my own ornament of " Thick As A
> Brick", or "Teacher," or "Living in The Past" All by Jerthro Tull .And
> dedicating it to you.
> Any ideas anyone?
>JT is fine. Just no The Huh, please.
>RT
Now, WHO, are you speaking of?
Michael Thames
www.ThamesClassicalGuitars.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roman Turovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Michael Thames" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "gary digman"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2005 2:16 PM
Subject: Re: sketches of spain lute
> >> I always found King Crimson to a bit "heady" and a >little
> >> "pretentious".
> >> It is "heady" only to cranial lightweights.
> >> RAT
> >
> > Roman, I'm thinking of making my own ornament of " Thick As A
> > Brick", or "Teacher," or "Living in The Past" All by Jerthro Tull .And
> > dedicating it to you.
> > Any ideas anyone?
> JT is fine. Just no The Huh, please.
> RT
>
>
>
> >
> > Michael Thames
> > www.ThamesClassicalGuitars.com
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Roman Turovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Michael Thames" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "gary digman"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
> > Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2005 2:02 PM
> > Subject: Re: sketches of spain lute
> >
> >
> >>>> I am not a big jazz fan, but Strayhorn's "Daydream" is as >great a
> > piece of
> >>>> music as anything classical.
> >>>> And having "The Who???" in the same paragraph is >preposterous.
> >>>> The only R&R entity that ever could stand up to classical >and be
> > judjed
> >>>> (favorably) on classical terms was KingCrimson's >LIZARD.
> >>>> RT
> >>>
> >>> I always found King Crimson to a bit "heady" and a little
> >>> "pretentious".
> >> It is "heady" only to cranial lightweights.
> >> RT
> >>
> >>
> >> ________________
> >> http://polyhymnion.org
> >>
> >>
> >>> Rock musicians, with too much knowledge, can be a dangerous
> >>> combination.
> >>> Unless you happen to be a heady, pretentious, self infatuated,
imaginary
> >>> composer. In which case one would be attracted to this kind of blues
> >>> butchery, and classify it as good classical music.
> >>> Michael Thames
> >>> www.ThamesClassicalGuitars.com
> >>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: "Roman Turovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> To: "gary digman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
> >>> Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2005 6:39 AM
> >>> Subject: Re: sketches of spain lute
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>> Dear Jim;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I do. I need jazz. I don't need the Who. That's just me. However, I
> >>>>> don't need every expression of jazz that's put out. I'm not going to
> > try
> >>> to
> >>>>> tell you that you should need jazz or that you should need the jazz
I
> >
> >>> like.
> >>>>> There's something for everybody. I don't know why we seem to find it
> >>>>> necessary to belittle each other's tastes in order to promote our
own.
> >>> The
> >>>>> whole argument seems to come down to the idea that what I like is
good
> >>> and
> >>>>> what I don't like is bad in some objective sense. So far no one has
> >>> managed
> >>>>> to articulate what objectively makes the Who good and Charlie Parker
> >>>> I am not a big jazz fan, but Strayhorn's "Daydream" is as great a
piece
> > of
> >>>> music as anything classical.
> >>>> And having "The Who???" in the same paragraph is preposterous.
> >>>> The only R&R entity that ever could stand up to classical and be
judjed
> >>>> (favorably) on classical terms was KingCrimson's LIZARD.
> >>>> RT
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> http://polyhymnion.org/torban
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> To get on or off this list see list information at
> >>>> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
