> your predictability. Too bad you do not live
> closer to me. I can certainly use an artist on
> the pay roll, and I would love to have you closer
> to observe.
I don't work for insolvent crooks.


> It should be obvious, even to mental midgets like
> you, that the relevance of the subject matter of
> my invective in this forum was established by
> Arthur Ness' unconscionable introduction of
> Leonhard Schulz into this forum. Once introduced,
> the subject is fair game for discussion.
Indeed. For those who have nothing to say. You are an indisputable mental
giant, a mental sperm-whale, no less.


> you do not mean to suggest that on any subject
> whatsoever, there is only one point of view that
> can be allowed here, and that is the view of the current nomenklatura?
MO, you tend to confuse a point of view with rectal discharge.
RT



___________________________________________________________
$0 Web Hosting with up to 200MB web space, 1000 MB Transfer
10 Personalized POP and Web E-mail Accounts, and much more.
Signup at www.doteasy.com



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to