> I thought that the structure of Mozart was conventional and > relatively uncontroversial: head, torso, two arms, two legs, the > usual minor appendages, etc. Peter Schiekele had an excellent discussion once of what makes WAM great as opposed to say, Salieri. WAM's strength was in adventurous modulation, and assymetric phrasing, even though his turns of phrase were not as unpredictable as Haydn's. RT
To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
