Dear Juan,

thanks for your post. It's interesting to see what tunings Yepes used to try to 
make the 
works more idiomatic in playing. I noticed that not all of his tunings are on 
the fancy 
side, 995, 999 and 1000 are in the usual tuning and for 996 he has just tuned 
the 
whole lute one tone up. This is the same as playing the Suite transposed to D 
minor in 
the usual tuning, which works very well but needs some adjustments in the 
Prelude 
and the Gigue. Andre Burguete has argued for this solution back in the 
nineties, 
however I'm not really convinced because the tessitura is quite low in this 
case.
His tunings for 998 and 1006a are transposed versions of a D major tuning with 
the 
first and fourth course tuned to f sharp (and for the Prelude of 1006a the 
fourth course 
would be tuned to g). Although this isn't quite what we would expect a lute to 
be tuned 
in the 18th century, the point of playing this pieces in D major (with the 
normal tuning) 
is valid in my eyes. Interestingly the Prelude and the Allegro of 998 works 
better in D 
major, while the Fugue works better in E flat major.
Yepes tuning for 997 is of course absurd from a HIP point of view (C Eb G C Eb 
G for 
courses 6 to 1), but it really seems to be the most problematic of the lute 
works. I still 
don't know how to play it. Burguete made the point of tuning the first five 
courses down 
half a tone, out of some pitch relation reasons. This results in a a third 
between the 
sixth and fifth course and descending basses down to the 14th course, which is 
a 
tuning he likes to see most of the lute works to be written for. Without this 
pitch 
guesswork I would think that maybe there was a fashion in Leipzig to tune 14c 
instruments this way, with one diatonic bass more and the usual low A or Ab on 
the 
14th course. 
Like you, as a guitarist I looked forward to play the lute or "lute" works on 
the Baroque 
lute for many years, but, I beg to differ, only to find them as problematic as 
on the 
guitar. On the guitar we are very much concerned with the limited bass 
capabilities, 
but play all kinds of difficult stuff up the neck (at least in modern times). 
The Baroque 
lute on the other hand requires keys with as many open strings as possible to 
sound 
well and give an idiomatic feel. Having a low, thin tessitura is surely not 
enough to 
qualify a piece as lute music, there are severall keyboard works by Bach which 
look 
the same when transposed down to suit a Lautenwerk. And the other way round: 
would anyone recognize a work originally composed for lute when transposed up a 
fourth or fifth and included in a keyboard collection? 

Regards,

Stephan

Am 5 May 2006 um 9:34 hat Juan Fco. Prieto geschrieben:

> Dear lutenists:
> I'm posting these two images containing the tuning used by Narciso
> Yepes to play Bach lute works.
> 
> http://personales.ya.com/jfppal/Afinaciones_Bach_Yepes_01.jpg
> http://personales.ya.com/jfppal/Afinaciones_Bach_Yepes_02.jpg
> 
> This is hard to find and comes from the vinyl version booklet, maybe
> the second complete recording after Podolsky, if I'm not wrong. (Do
> you know if Michel Podolsky recorded all the Bach works?) This
> recording was released some years ago in two CD but omitting this
> interesting information. For curiousity only, the baroque lute was
> played with nails (as Julian Bream or Konrad Ragossnig did. This was
> the "guitarists-playing-lute" time) and it seems he played a pair of
> instruments, one of these with 14 courses. More info about this point
> will be welcome. A good try and approaching in any case, but detested
> by purists, obviously. All my life as guitarist dreaming: "The day
> shall arrive I'll play these beautiful works in original tones and
> instrument" and I'm now realising, ironically, that maybe these works
> are more idiomatic for guitar than for baroque lute, according to the
> variety of complex "solutions" proposed to reach a reasonably good
> result. The second irony is that these works are with no dubt the best
> composed for this instrument. Greetings, -- Juan Fco.
> 
> --
> 
> To get on or off this list see list information at
> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
> 




Reply via email to