"But, the string does get stopped, and the sounding part is lower when stopped. Fret 2 must be low enough to clear the string stopped at fret 1...." ...and sometimes a smidge more to avoid the buzz. Maybe .02mm or more if the lute has a low action. Maybe zero if a high action. You might want more (or less) depending on large gut basses or high wearing nylon trebles. Measure the fret diameter that you remove and the one you intend to put on to make sure you aren't simply "trusting the numbers". There's often a slight variance in string sizes of about 10 to 20 microns (+/- .02mm) and occasionally more on used strings. Again, it's all about individuals and individual lutes. You may want to keep a record as your lute, strings and preferences will change over the years. Either way, invest in a measuring caliper. Electronic ones are very reasonable now ($20 at Harbor Freight). Of course a fiberglass analog one is cheaper and works about as well and the traditional micrometer has no sharp edges. all the best, Sean Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Aug 31, 2006, Paul Pleijsier said: > What is the rationale of diminishing fret height towards higher positions? If one never stops the string, yes, there is no need for graduation (or frets, so this is academic). But, the string does get stopped, and the sounding part is lower when stopped. Fret 2 must be low enough to clear the string stopped at fret 1.... -- Dana Emery To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html --
