Dear Bernd,
Thanks! I think your explanation is very probably
the correct one. As you say, much depends on which
interpretation of the rules one chooses. Your version,
I think, corresponds to what Ornithoparchus / Dowland
would have thought of as the 'modern' interpretation,
i.e. the C with a stroke through it plus a numeral 3 alongside
it means a 'diminution' of measure lenghts to a third of
their previous lengths. In this case, by changing time from
triple to duple and reducing the duration of a bar from three
minims to one minim, there is a perceived doubling in the
speed of the piece. QUESTION: Doesn't the underlying
tactus stay the same? And is this why decorative running
passages became known as 'diminutions'?

We really need to study the use of time indications in Dalza
and the other Petrucci lute books to get a better understanding
of this. For example, taking the Pavana alla Venetiana beginning
on f. 9r: The saltarello beginning on f.9v has a 'C3' as its time signature
which  corresponds to perfect time. Dalza / Petrucci give the
piece three minims per bar using the special triple-time flags. The piva
which follows, beginning on f.10v, has the 'C with a stroke through it and
numeral 3' sign, and here the bar lengths are halved to three crotchets per
bar, again using the triple time flags. So the rhythm flags suggest a
halving
of note values, but the 'time signature' suggests that the measure length
in the piva should be one third of that in the saltarello? I'm not sure!
Contemporary dance practice could probably throw some light on this,
although the interpretation of dance manuals is perhaps just as fraught as
lute tablature.

I spent quite a lot of time studying some aspects of Dalza a few years
ago and was amazed that despite the book having been available in
facsimile since 1980, and Dalza being perhaps the most popular lute
composer of his era, the book is still full of unsolved mysteries.

Best wishes,

Denys




----- Original Message -----
From: "Bernd Haegemann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "lute net" <[email protected]>; "Denys Stephens"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 5:26 PM
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Dalza


> Dear Denys & all,
>
>
> > this to Dalza's recercar on f. 7, the piece starts in triple time
> > with each measure having a value of a semibreve. The first three
> > measures indeed have three minims each.
>
> yes
>
> >
> > Over the page on f.7v the time changes with the sign of a broken
> > circle with a vertical line through it and a numeral 3 set against it.
> > The broken circle indicates imperfect (i.e. duple) time. The tables
> > in the Micrologus suggest that the vertical line indicates a
'diminution'
> > and the numeral 3 indicates that the diminution is of a factor of 3.
> > The definition of a diminution is a little confusing: apparently 'the
> > ancients'
> > considered it to consist of reducing the length of a measure by a third,
> > whilst
> > 'the moderns' consider it to be reducing the length of a measure by a
half.
> > But it
> > goes on to say that a number placed against the diminution sign
indicates
> > the value of the diminution.
>
> I am still a bit confused about the signs, but I also went to the
> bookshelves and found out that there is an "implicit confusion", dating
> back to the times themselves when the signs were used - with different
meanings.
>
> But the diminutio, indicated by the vertical line through the C -symbol,
> is for sure. (Like this, it would be diminutio dupla.) If there follows
only ONE number (not
> a fraction like 3/1 or
> 1/2 ) it indicates the proportion of the diminuition. In this case we have
a
> C and a three, which means that the music change to imperfect tempus and
> minor prolatio AND the there is a diminuition by the factor of... well, 3.
> (There are also examples where this 3 stands for the proportio
sesquialtera (3/2).)
>
> So, I suggest that we have a proportio of 3 new semibreves corresponding
to
> one of the old ones. In the Dalza case 3 new "measures" take the same time
> as one of the old, triple ones.This would mean double tempo, wouldn't it.
>
> ?! Next try, please? :-)
> best wishes
> Bernd
>
>
>
>
>
> To get on or off this list see list information at
> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.13.9/490 - Release Date: 20/10/2006
>
>



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.13.9/490 - Release Date: 20/10/2006


Reply via email to