Heft 1 is a collection of 12 Newslider pieces in "E" tuning for guitar.  No 
facsimile.  No technical instruction on lute except to say. "Das Prinzip 
dieser Spielweise ist im 'Spiel der Lauteninstrumente' Lehrheft 1 and 2 
dargestellt."  It is really just music.
Sandy
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jorge Torres" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Sandy Hackney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "adS" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Lutelist" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 8:50 PM
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Gerwig text


>
> Thank you to all who responded to my query regarding Gerwig.  I was on 
> OCLC
> looking for Satoh's method for Baroque lute, and when I used the subject
> search term links, I found the Gerwig.  My questions are:
>
> Is it in any way a method for lute?
>
> Are there any pieces in tablature?  Are there any facsimiles?
>
> Does the text say anything about how to play, hold or interpret on the 
> lute,
> or give any insight to Gerwig as a player/teacher?
>
> Thanks,
> Jorge
>
>
>
>
> On 10/25/06 8:05 PM, "Sandy Hackney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I also have Heft 1 and some others as well.  How can I help?
>> Sandy
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "adS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: "Lutelist" <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 6:10 PM
>> Subject: [LUTE] Re: Gerwig text
>>
>>
>>> I think I have Heft 1.
>>>
>>> What do you want to know?
>>>
>>>
>>> Rainer aus dem Spring
>>>
>>> Jorge Torres wrote:
>>>> Dear List:
>>>>
>>>> Does anybody have experience with the following Walter Gerwig
>>>> publication?
>>>>
>>>> Das Spiel der Lauteninstrumente : der Lautenist
>>>>
>>>> Berlin-Lichterfelde : R. Lienau, 1961?
>>>>
>>>> Heft l. Aus Ein newgeordnet künstlich Lautenbuch.--Heft 2. Aus einer
>>>> Lautenhandschrift des 16. Jahrhunderts.--Heft 6-7. Alte und neue Musik
>>>> für
>>>> das Solospiel.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Jorge Torres
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> To get on or off this list see list information at
>>>> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> 



Reply via email to