No, the Google Flash converter works much better. RT ----- Original Message ----- From: "Doctor Oakroot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 7:51 AM Subject: [LUTE] [Re: Google vs Youtube]
> Whoops, I once again forgot that this list doesn't work right. lol > > ---------------------------- Original Message ---------------------------- > Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Google vs Youtube > From: "Doctor Oakroot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Mon, February 26, 2007 7:48 am > To: "Ed Durbrow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Looks very similar to me... no surprise since Google owns Youtube. The > google video is probably youtube technology running in a google skin. > >> What a difference! >> >> On Feb 26, 2007, at 10:46 AM, Roman Turovsky wrote: >> >>> Google doesn't have synch problems, and the visual aspect is much >>> better >>> too: >>> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5041167636801710718&hl=en >>> RT >> >> Ed Durbrow >> Saitama, Japan >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://www9.plala.or.jp/edurbrow/ >> >> >> >> -- >> >> To get on or off this list see list information at >> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html >> > > > -- > http://DoctorOakroot.com - Rough-edged songs on homemade GIT-tars. > > > -- > http://DoctorOakroot.com - Rough-edged songs on homemade GIT-tars. > > >
