Hi Andrew,

1600 is a rough date. John Dowland is a crown's witness >;) who during
his carrier changed from thumb-in to thumb-out. I'm uncertain concerning
all the other European players, but e. g. Jean Baptiste Besard
recommended thumb-out in his method shortly after 1600 (1603, if memory
correctly serves). To put it the other way round, I don't know of a
source that recommends thumb-in after 1600. 

As for the baroque lute, all the iconographic material that I'm aware of
points to thumb-out, even though there is a picture of Charles Mouton
who stretches his thumb out but doesn't hold his fingers in an exact 90°
angle toward the strings. So, the least that can be said is, that
thumb-out isn't un-HIP for lute music after 1600.

Mathias

"Andrew Gibbs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Hello Mathias
> Is it right to think that thumb-out is the historically correct  
> technique for lute music composed post 1600? Did lute players all  
> over Europe switch to thumb-out around 1600? And this might be a  
> silly question: are there any players today who use both techniques:  
> thumb-in for renaissance pieces and thumb-out for baroque?
> 
> I didn't play much guitar before taking up the lute so learning thumb- 
> in hasn't involved breaking any habits - but I am (perhaps overly)  
> concerned with historical correctness.
> 
> Andrew (also a beginner player)
> 
> On 1 May 2007, at 14:11, Mathias Rösel wrote:
> 
> > Hi John,
> >
> > thumb-in is not the only technique to be used for the renaissance  
> > lute.
> > There is still another technique, called thumb-out, which resembles
> > guitar technique a lot. The pinky stays on the soundboard, but the
> > forefinger, middle and ring finger are held in a right angle toward  
> > the
> > strings (instead of parallel as with thumb-in), and the thumb is
> > stretched out, being held parallel to the bass courses.
> >
> > I've played the lute for almost 25 years by now, using thumb-in
> > exclusively, even with the baroque lute (sic!), as I was under
> > impression that is the proper way. Only since some five months I've
> > seriously tried thumb-out, and I have to say, it works well, producing
> > quite a distinct sound which differs from what comes out of thumb-in.
> >
> > All I wanted to say is, you are not doomed to thumb-in, and if it
> > doesn't work for you, try the other. It was developed around 1600 for
> > playing lutes with seven and more courses.



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to