Maybe that gut is the best choice, but i tend to wet fingertips so gut
is terrible. I tried nylgut, it has a good sound, but with wet
fingertips nylgut on the 1th and 2th  tends to squeak, when i play it.
So my combination is nylon on 1th to 3th, carbon on 4th and 5th and a
combination of copperwounded nylgut and carbon on 6th and 7th.
W.
P.s. and i heard wet fingertips are not my problem alone



-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: ariel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Gesendet: Samstag, 9. Juni 2007 11:29
An: LuteNet list; Bruno Correia
Betreff: [LUTE] Re: Carbon strings




>
> Better: change to gut and start playing lute.
>
> David
>
>

I'll email Paul O'Dette and Hoppy Smith right away and tell them that,
so 
they can finally start playing the lute and not the funny toy they've
been 
using for ages. I'll forward the info to Eugène Ferré, who's also quite 
naive and seem to be very bad informed.


Bruno,

We've been here before.

Nylgut are more flexible in terms of what you can do with them. They're 
reasonable stable, and last quite a lot. For my taste, the best
synthetic 
option.
Carbon are difficult to deal with for people with oversensitive skin,
but 
their sound can be very interesting.
It is always difficult to be conclusive, as some people make an
excellent 
sound with every type of string, and some other would blame the string
and 
wouldn't question themselves.
There're cases of people satisfied with a mediocre and poor sound
claming 
how good they and their strings are, but I wouldn't worry about them. As
carbon and nylgut are affordable, try both, play them for a while, and 
you will make your choice.
While it is true that different strings feel different and of course
sound 
different, it is mostly the plucking technique what defines your sound 
quality.
Working on tone production is the answer. Then you can make your choice.
I 
guess you know all this.
Some player will say that there's a difference in developing a sound for
gut 
or for synthetic, but this is not fully correct.
I've used both, and they both require serious and constant training. 
There're no different techniques for one and the other. Hear someone
like 
O'Dette playing a gut strung instrument and then a synthetic one.
Leaving 
apart the taste, there will be no difference in the technique used.

For a 6 course (or even a 8 course) lute or vihuela  I'd choose gut
basses, 
or at least try to avoid overspun strings, but again I wouldn't claim
that's 
the only option to make things work properly.
You can always train your fingers so they do exactly what you want to
hear.

Ariel.





To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



Reply via email to