>> with a hint of the metallic. I would imagine it could be due to the frequence cut operated, by transferring to MP3, or even the tonal quality of the internal mike, rather than any double strings (if they are double?). Actually, it still sounds as though its recorded quite close, but obviously the instrument is louder. <<
Thanks for the feed back. Double strings, only first one single. WAV-file is a little warmer, indeed. Distance is still too close, but real mics are coming. Too busy now to even go to the shops ... >> How do you look after the in-put volume control when you have to place the recorder a fairly long way off, to distance the internal mikes from yourself? << No problem, just do a little test recording, go back and check. Do again untill gain control is right. David **************************** David van Ooijen [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.davidvanooijen.nl **************************** You need very good sight, and probably have to keep getting up to alter the input level, or a very long pair of tweezers. I imagine that with a pair of microphones, you can keep the recorder closer to you, and it should be much easier to operate. Regards Anthony Le 18 juin 07 à 18:12, G. Crona a écrit : > This is from the suite I play! Nice music. Sounded much better although a > tad metallic. Double courses? > > Best > > G. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "LGS-Europe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2007 1:34 PM > Subject: [LUTE] Zamboni added > > >> Just recorded and added a prelude by Zamboni to my Home recordings page. >> No >> reverb added, but the instrument has much more reverb, and I've >> increased >> the distance from lute to microphone. Quite happy with this one. >> >> David >> >> >> >> **************************** >> David van Ooijen >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> www.davidvanooijen.nl >> **************************** > > > > To get on or off this list see list information at > http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
