Dear lutenists,

While having a glass of Malbec wine and my memory is still reasonably
fresh, I'd like to share a few coments about the concert that Anthony Rooley
and Emma Kirkby gave here in Rio de Janeiro last Friday.
First of all, I was very excited to see two very famous specialists in early
music in a recital dedicated to English songs (Dowland, Campion and
Coprario). By coincidence my last concert was on English songs as well...

The hall is fairly large one, 835 seats to be specific. However the
acoustics is wonderful, I've seen many great concerts there. But that night
only one third of the hall was full and I on purpose was seating on the 8th
row (about the middle of the theatre) just because I wanted to know how the
duo would deal with the sound projection in such a place. For a moment
before the concert I thought that it might be amplified... silly thought, it
wasn't.

The concert began and they made a very good visual impression, she was
dressed beautifully, perfect for the ocasion while he was more discreet but
nevertheless good looking on stage. Her singing was superb from the
beguinning of the concert to the end, hard to describe how well sang: Her
gestures, phrasing, dynamics, interpretaion, diction, knowledge of the
style, sensitivity, everything combined to deliver a first class recital.

Well, I was suposed to be talking about the lute! Sorry...

On the other hand, the lute sound was very, very, very small... Anthony
joked before the second half explaining about the English lute song
repertoire and especially the lute: "The smallest sounding instrument men
ever built" (his words...), people laughed, unfortunately for a moment a
felt myself as having "The smallest pXnXs in the world"...
In fact it was hard to hear his (Anthony) playing and in the few ocasions
where he did solos, it was also painful to hear or to understand what he was
doing. later I understood why.

The second half I sat at the third row on the right side of the hall. I must
say it was better not only to see Emma's closely and wach her expressions
but also to hear the poor chap on the lute. Then I had a better idea of what
was going on. Apart from the size of the hall being not ideal for such a
performance, the lutenist was playing with guitar technique, not resting
the pinky on the soundboard and not plucking the strings properly (I mean,
using the technique described by Pat O'Brian as releasing the finger from
the string, which enhances the sound quite a bit), his hand was also jumping
every chord he played and finally there was no sight of thumb under or even
thumb over (as Nigel North) in the divisions and scales. It was not for free
that his overrall sound was very stacato and specially the divisions were
very non legato with his index middle alternation. My impression was simply
that he did not bring the sound effectively from the instrument and in fact
everyone I knew in the concert complained about it (I'm not that crazy...)

After the recital I decided to ask him a few questions. He said he was using
nylon strings and  Pyramid wounded basses. Well, at least now is very clear
why the sound was so dark on the trebles besides of his faulty technique...
With PVF or even better Nylgut (gut would be very tricky) the result could
have been a little better.

This kind of event makes me feel great by seing our instrument being exposed
to an wider audience, but the general feeling according to most people that
I know including musicians, that the lute is not apt to the concert
plataform, still remains.

Note - Coments welcomed!

--




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to