Is there a way to reverse engineer a searchable text version, that is just a diplomatic facsimile? Then people could add comments and explanations to the online version We could divide it up, or *hint hint* one of the many computer mavens on this forum could take it on :)
dt At 01:09 PM 11/14/2007, you wrote: >I can put it on my server, both public and my privte one but with lower speed. > > > >On 11/14/07, David Tayler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is it possible to post the readable version using yousendit (the free ftp) > > dt > > > > > > At 10:42 AM 11/14/2007, you wrote: > > >I may have missed a bit in my last paragraph: > > > > > >The 1771 PDF I have is 32Mb. So Greg's scans, if they are 12Mb total, > > >will result in a PDF that is also around 12Mb. The point however, is > > >that as a PDF, it is a one-piece file that can be read like a book, > > >rather than 223 individual page files. Navigating a book is inherently > > >easier than navigating 223 individual papers, and it's no different > > >for files. (try printing a few pages when they're all separate image > > >files.) > > > > > >Anyway, was this with the large or small files? > > > > > >ray > > > > > >On Nov 14, 2007 1:26 PM, G. Crona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > And Greg Lindahl has the 1608 edition scanned and available > > > > > one-page-at-a-time at > > > > > http://www.pbm.com/~lindahl/morley/1608/ > > > > > > > > 223 png files + html = 12,2 Mb > > > > > > > > G. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >To get on or off this list see list information at > > >http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html > > > > > >
