On Sat, Nov 17, 2007, Tony Chalkley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Harrumph! It would hardly hurt if they all waived their copyright this late > in the day
I agree, but you have to recall that posting on the internet is quite a lot more exposure than was involved originally, and the authors might not want to have some of that material exposed today, I recall some heated debate over occams razor for example. > With whom would the copyright of the index of articles lie? Any ideas? google "FoMRHI Index". -- Dana Emery To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
