Hello, Stephan.  It is difficult to explain in a few words with out holding 
the lute & demonstrating the manner I have found that works.  Particularly 
the lower or deeper basses need to be played fast;  that is, when playing 
through the fundamental and octave together, if one plays those 2 strings 
with a bit more speed than usual, a clearer sound is obtained.

Another view is to play with slightly more pressure than usual.  2 years 
ago in the summer, I re-strung my 13 course with synthetic strings, and I 
immediately notice that in playing the basses, they were too "loud", or 
present with synthetics.  I accommodated this by playing slower through the 
course, and with less pressure.  At that point, I think I had the "right 
touch" for the synthetic strings.  When I went back to gut, I noticed again 
that I had to increase the pressure and speed through the course, in order 
to get a clean, clear sound.  Also, when I play through the course, I 
actually try to push the string down toward the belly, & then release the 
course with the thumb.  I think this is what can get a clearer sound with 
gut basses.

I notice that when I hear others play my lute, they do not sound as clear 
(that is, as clear as I think I sound), and it is because of what I explained.

It took a great deal of time in working with gut basses in learning to get 
the sound I was after.

Thanks for asking,

ed




At 12:14 PM 12/3/2007 +0100, Stephan Olbertz wrote:
>Am 2 Dec 2007 um 16:07 hat Edward Martin geschrieben:
>
> > that is, it does
> > take a different approach with the right hand in learning how to use gut
> > appropriately & beautifully.
>
>And that would be?
>
>Thanks and regards,
>
>Stephan
>
>
> >
> > Down to only 4 instruments?  Too bad....
> >
> > ed
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > At 10:44 AM 12/2/2007 -0500, Daniel Shoskes wrote:
> > >Ed, as you know I have gone through phases of experimentation with
> > >gut on my barqoue lutes. Even though we both live in cold climes, I
> > >have not been successful keeping gut easily in tune, at least not on
> > >my bass rider. With my limited time to practice, it is simply not
> > >possible to spend a good chunk of time tuning. Also, and I know this
> > >is sacrilege, I don't find the sound difference to be worth it to me.
> > >I think that gut requires a different right hand technique to sound
> > >at it's best and too often I have heard gut played poorly with I
> > >suppose the implicit message being "well it's on gut, so it must
> > >sound great and be authentic". OTOH, I'm not criticizing anyone who
> > >spends the time and effort to make a fully gut strung instrument
> > >sound great and I've heard that many times too (eg. Earl Christy at
> > >LSA, the recent luteduo videos and of course YOU Ed).
> > >
> > >I'm not a recording or performance artist and even with the
> > >occasional amateur concert or youtube video I'm pretty much playing
> > >for my own enjoyment, so this is what has worked for me so far.
> > >Having said that, I am interested in new developments in gut
> > >technology and always willing to try something new, once it has been
> > >vetted by the gut experts on the cutting edge. What has peaked my
> > >interest again is this swan neck discussion. I love the volume and
> > >balance of the Jauch but don't want to devote my RH thumb to damping
> > >every bass I strike.  That's why the idea of a Jauch with long thick
> > >gut basses and "best current technology" trebles is appealing. For
> > >crying out loud, I'm down to only 4 instruments at the moment!
> > >
> > >Danny
> > >www.dshoskes.com
> > >www.youtube.com/kidneykutter
> > >
> > >On Dec 2, 2007, at 9:41 AM, Edward Martin wrote:
> > >
> > >>Why not stringing it all in gut?
> > >>
> > >>ed
> > >>
> > >>At 08:36 AM 12/2/2007 -0500, Daniel Shoskes wrote:
> > >>>That is what I find interesting though. Long gut strings seem to be
> > >>>much more stable in terms of keeping in tune (and getting them
> > >>>there). I like the idea of long guts in the basses of a Jauch and
> > >>>then nylgut and KF for the fingerboard strings.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>Edward Martin
> > >>2817 East 2nd Street
> > >>Duluth, Minnesota  55812
> > >>e-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>voice:  (218) 728-1202
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>To get on or off this list see list information at
> > >>http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >--
> > >No virus found in this incoming message.
> > >Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database:
> > >269.16.12/1163 - Release Date: 12/1/2007 12:05 PM
> >
> >
> >
> > Edward Martin
> > 2817 East 2nd Street
> > Duluth, Minnesota  55812
> > e-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > voice:  (218) 728-1202
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.13/1165 - Release Date: 
>12/2/2007 8:34 PM



Edward Martin
2817 East 2nd Street
Duluth, Minnesota  55812
e-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
voice:  (218) 728-1202



Reply via email to