Hi David,

Thanks for your response to my query - to me it does make a lot of sense.
Compared to the process Rob outlined, it does involve a lot more drawing,
and plenty of accurate cutting out, but all working to well-defined
parameters... I guess it appeals to the engineer in me!

Best regards

Din





> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Van Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: 05 December 2007 17:18
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: 'Rob Dorsey'; 'Jon Murphy'; 'lute-builder'
> Subject: [LUTE-BUILDER] Re: Lute - Baroque Guitar
> 
> Dear Dan, Din, Jon, Rob etc,
> 
> I have nothing against solid moulds as this shows 
> http://www.vanedwards.co.uk/moulds.htm
> 
> In practice I use skeleton moulds for lutes with fewer than 
> 19 ribs and solid moulds for those with more. I find the 
> skeleton better for aligning ribs while building and they are 
> certainly quicker to make, which is why I showed them in my 
> courses. It even has historic precedent in the Arnault of 
> Zwolle manuscript. There are no historic moulds surviving, so 
> for all we know the original makers all used skeleton moulds, 
> though not in MDF, that horrid but useful material!
> 
> However in answer to Din's query I normally build up my solid 
> moulds in exactly the same way as the skeletons but with each 
> cross-section defined on paper first, which ensures the shape 
> remains as designed and allows me to make then hollow at the 
> same time. This makes the large theorbo moulds light enough 
> to handle with ease. After the cross-sections are all glued 
> up, the protruding corners are simply chiselled off leaving 
> the exact mould shape, as I show in the lower picture. It's a 
> nice metaphor to think of carving the air space and in fact 
> that's what I'm doing, but on paper first. Perhaps I'm more 
> used to seeing the 3D shape within the drawings having done 
> it so much.
> 
> Thirty years ago, when I first started, I used to build 
> without a mould in just the way Dan describes (following Ian 
> Harwood, who I think first came up with the idea) and it's 
> certainly a very quick method. But it's difficult (but not 
> impossible if you build a jig for each rib) to build the more 
> complex shapes which are not semi-circular in cross-section 
> and only a few of the historic surviving lutes are like that. 
> Most involve twisted and assymetric ribs and I came to prefer 
> these shapes, hence the large number of moulds.
> 
> As ever there are many routes to the same end.........
> 
> Best wishes,
> 
> David
> 
> 
> At 16:25 +0000 4/12/07, Din Ghani wrote:
> >Jon,
> >
> >I wish I had your carving skills - next time I make a lute 
> I'd like to 
> >try a solid mould, but the thought of producing a complex shape with 
> >accurately curved lines and surfaces out of a lump of wood terrifies 
> >me! I'm sure with your experience of carving you will be 
> able to work out how to go about it.
> >
> >I just about managed to carve the neck block with fairly accurate 
> >facets, following detailed instructions from David, and 
> using the lines 
> >and facets from the completed mould to guide the carving. 
> >Unfortunately, as far as I can see, Lundberg's book does not even 
> >mention how the facets on the mould are cut. Rob, I hope you 
> might be 
> >able to give me a clue, having learnt directly from him. I 
> assume there 
> >is a systematic method, not relying just on a steady hand 
> and a sharp eye?
> >
> >At heart, I guess I'm more of an engineer than a craftsman...
> >
> >Regards
> >
> >Din
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>  -----Original Message-----
> >>  From: Rob Dorsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>  Sent: 04 December 2007 14:22
> >>  To: 'Jon Murphy'; 'lute-builder'
> >>  Subject: [LUTE-BUILDER] Re: Lute - Baroque Guitar
> >>
> >>  Jon,
> >>
> >>  I've made molds from pine lumber which works fine albeit  
> harder to 
> >> carve but the best is bass wood or boxwood.
> >>  Basswood carves like butter and is easy to finish. As an  
> >> avant-garde touch, you can carve the mould without facets so  that 
> >> the number of ribs can be varied or a multi-rib (39 or
> >>  so) can be made if you're feeling particularly industrious.
> >>
> >>  Best,
> >>  Rob Dorsey
> >>  http://RobDorsey.com
> >>
> >>  -----Original Message-----
> >>  From: Jon Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>  Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 2:08 AM
> >>  To: lute-builder
> >>  Subject: [LUTE-BUILDER] Re: Lute - Baroque Guitar
> >>
> >>  All,
> >>
> >>  I think Rob has convinced me to can my skeletal form and make  a 
> >> solid one. I like the idea of sculpting the air within the 
>  body, and 
> >> as a woodcarver I have all the tools and skills for  
> shaping a solid 
> >> form. The confidence I'll gain from having
> >  > the form fully shaped will probably get me off my butt to
> >>  make the body of my incipient lute.
> >>
> >>  Dan's method is attractive in the apparent speed of the  process, 
> >> but I doubt I could accomplish it without being  "hands on" at his 
> >> workshop (which is tempting, but June is a  long time away).
> >>
> >>  Best, Jon
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>  To get on or off this list see list information at  
> >> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
> >>
> 
> 
> --
> The Smokehouse,
> 6 Whitwell Road,
> Norwich,  NR1 4HB      
> England.
> 
> Telephone: + 44 (0)1603 629899
> Website: http://www.vanedwards.co.uk
> 


Reply via email to