(Sorry David for sending this to your private mailbox. I don't master yet all 
the subtleties of replying to the list when I get messages from such or such 
person )

Thanks David. That's a clear statement, full of good sense and and I totally 
concur. My "not so small" theorbo, which  I use for continuo, is 80 cm on the 
fingerboard and I have not particularly small hands, being more than 6 ft tall, 
but I must confess I have already quite a "handful" of it... My smaller 
theorbo, which I occasionally use for continuo too :) is 73 cm, and that would 
almost make a "tiorbino" of it if I understand well... ;-) !

Best,

Jean-Marie

>>Martyn wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>If you have anything like the Praetorius, Mace, Picinni, Talbot evidence on 
>>large theorbos but clearly relating to smalI instruments in this tuning, I'd 
>>like to see it please.
>><<
>>
>>So far we have seen evidence of reentrant tuning for large theorbos, thank 
>>you for the references. And we have solo music requiring reentrant tuning 
>>and strongly suggesting a-tuning (Kapsberger). However, we have not seen 
>>evidence stating small theorbos could not be tuned reentrant. Your opinion 
>>on the matter is clear, but your arguments are not. I hate to be taking 
>>sides in an argument that could, and should, bring us all to a better 
>>understanding of the historical record and, especially interesting for me, 
>>its consequences for our own playing today, but as it stands now I think the 
>>burden of proof is on your side: what are the arguments to deny the 
>>possibility of tuning a small theorbo reentrant in a? Saying, as I 
>>understand you to do, that the fact that large theorbos were tuned reentrant 
>>is proof small theorbos were not tuned reentrant, does not make sense. I 
>>agree with you that bigger is better for much of theorbo continuo practice. 
>>I agree with you that many of us, myself included, have a 'toy' theorbos 
>>(76cm here!) not ideally suited for some of the continuo repertoire 
>>(Montevredi las weekend!) we play on it nonetheless. I agree with you that 
>>covering up the defects of a small theorbo by using overspun basses on 6 
>>(and lower if present at the fingerboard) is a modern solution. But I see no 
>>evidence denying the historical possibility of tuning a small theorbo 
>>reentrant in a. On the contrary, some would argue that the solo music (in a) 
>>would require a small theorbo as it would require rather very large hands to 
>>be played on one of the very large continuo theorbos.
>>
>>respectfully
>>
>>David
>>
>>
>>****************************
>>David van Ooijen
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>www.davidvanooijen.nl
>>**************************** 
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>To get on or off this list see list information at
>>http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>Orange vous informe que cet  e-mail a ete controle par l'anti-virus mail. 
>>Aucun virus connu a ce jour par nos services n'a ete detecte.
>>
>>
>
>= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 
>          
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://poirierjm.free.fr
>08-02-2008 

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 
  
Jean-Marie Poirier
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
08-02-2008 



Reply via email to