Out of curiosity, all ye to read from this edition or Arthur himself, how do the grand staff versions handle octave basses?
Thanks, Eugene At 03:29 AM 11/25/2008, David Tayler wrote: >I play from the grand staff in Ness's edition, I first mark any >differences to the tab, then cut and paste them--fewer page turns. >The parts are very nicely realized in the transcription. >dt > > >At 06:39 PM 11/24/2008, you wrote: > >Hi, all, > >I just checked, and yes, Mr. Ness's old Francesco edition does have > >grand staff, as do all of the old Corpus des Luthistes Francais > >volumes from Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. (Ballard > >1&2, Bocquet, Morlaye, etc.) > >Good luck, Guy! > >Best to all, and keep playing, > >Chris. > > > > >>> "Guy Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/24/2008 5:10 PM >>> > >There's a lot of guitar transcriptions out there, if guitar staff is OK. If > >you need grand staff, a couple that come immediately to mind are the > >Kanazawa Holborne, and the Ness Francesco volumes (I think Arthur included a > >grand staff version with that edition, but I don't have a copy myself). > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Herbert Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 2:01 PM > >To: [email protected] > >Subject: [LUTE] Material for sight reading. > > > > > >What is a good way to get a quantity of sight-reading material > >in the keys of C, F, and G? I need modern staff notation (not > >tablature), like modern-day piano music. To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
