Dana wrote:
|> > 
|> >> "They must be played with a somewhat fast air [so much for the slow  
|> >> pavan]
|> 
|> well, perhaps the tempo can be varied enough to get that certain peacock
|> and his retinue thru the line as quickly as possible; perhaps at a wedding
|> when the priest is visibly impatient for whatever reason.
|> 
You are right about the pavan and its purpose, though I wonder how that
relates to the playing of same on a lute.

Practically, your average lute is not a loud instrument, and certainly
tends to get lost in the noise of your average dance.  Leave aside the
stepping and swishing, there is also the on-going clatter, voices, and
so on.  All in all, it is not the best instrument for playing dances, 
aside from very intimate ones.

My take on it is that the tactus becomes crucial.  So when the mid to 
late 16thC write "pavan" they possibly mean "in the style of a pavan", 
rather than "grab your partner".  The implication is that once the
tactus is set, you stay at that tempo.  If the piece moves into three
then the tactus remains on the one, and we go measure for measure.

Seems to work for me.

-- 
Best regards .. mark  



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to