> [email protected] wrote:

> You all must have been really good sight readers!

At the time I was paying with a Collegium Musicum that was the typical
repetoire, and, yes, we were all at least good at sight reading from
necessity.  I was also active in church choir, a madrigals group, and a
choral society, it wasnt all lute, nor was it all playing at sight.

The intense workouts challenged all of us to grow, and so we did.  I came
in able to play much from memory, but less at sight, especially in certain
keys or at tempo.  I soon developed the ability to play at least some of
the notes at tempo, filling in as my LH became more clever, or perhaps I
was learning the riffs.  After a couple years witht he CM I had a pretty
good sight-playing ability, but I still needed to work on pieces between
sessions.  We began each season with the directors choice of potential
repetoire, a large stack of manilla folders to be considered.  Several
weeks of sight-play using a varied orchestration followed, only he knew
what the final choices would be for the concert, or what orchestration
would be used.  Some years I played lots of different instruments and
played in most pieces, others I only sang.  Lots of fun and an excellent
challenge, take it up eagerly if you have the chance.
--
Dana Emery



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to