"What difficulty?" (Ed asks about my reference to thumb-under
   technique).  Perhaps my understanding of this technique is incorrect.
   But, I think of it as implying the use of p-i for running lines
   whenever possible.

   I think of thumb-over as allowing use of m-i whenever desired.  So, I
   think of the person useing thumb over technique as using m-i more than
   the person using thumb under - at least whenever bass notes are present
   along with treble ones.  So, for example, if a section in 4/4 has 16th
   notes in the treble throughtout a measure with quarter-note bass notes
   (see the 5th from the last measure of Dowland's "A Fancy" - number 5 in
   Poulton's edition) I would approach that (using thumb under) by playing
   the last three 16th notes of each group of four with i-p-i.  My
   assumption - perhaps not correct - is that the thumb-over player would
   most likely play those 16th notes i-m-i, keeping the thumb in the bass
   area ready to play the bass notes.

   This seems "easier" to me, in that the danger of missing - or not
   striking cleanly - a bass note is lessened.



   Ned

   --


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to