Hi Ned,

   here my daily letter, probably the last. I once had similar questions
   and no one to discuss or ask, so perhaps I've written too much. Take it
   for good will.

   You wrote :
   >But I still wonder if, using thumb out, there isn't more of a
   temptation to do this; namely, play trebles with m-i.

   For Besard 1603, there was plenty of it. Perhaps you know that his
   tractate about lute techniqe from the Thesaurus Harmonicus 1603 was
   reprinted by Robert Dowland in "Variety of Lute-lessons" 1610 as
   a translation from Latin into English by John Dowland under "Necessary
   Oservations". See especially p. C2,  "These things being....etc.". You
   find the facsimile here
   [1]http://musickshandmade.com/lute/facbooks/view/12  pic 9
   Before this Besard had thoroughly explained how to play thumb out with
   using p-i alternation.

   In the "Isagoge in artem testudinariam" (Augsburg 1617), nearly the
   same tractatus appears, somewhat extended. Here Besard goes still
   farther, see p. Dij:

   "About the two first fingers (of the right hand)/how to use them for
   colorating (diminution)/ as well as for making common articulations and
   plucking chords.

   Concerning the diminutiones or coloratur, this is commonly done with
   the thumb and index. Now must be noted that instead of those not
   insuitably, but even well, the first two fingers can be used,
   especially if the coloraturen (diminutions) are thus that after every
   third or fifth beat (note), a bass (note) is set/ as can be seen in the
   attached example . From this application follow two fine advantages.
   First, the coloratur is much easier for the hand/ second, the uncomely
   motion or shaking of the arm will be avoided (which else by many cannot
   be omitted).
   Example belonging here, see fol. (page) 12.
   If there are not any Bassi to play with the diminutionibus or
   coloraturen, or if the diminutions are running too rapidly/ as if for
   example they had such a mensur [sign of a semifusa] above them: then I
   think it better that one uses the thumb and index/ (and) also in the
   case/when the diminutiones happen on the fourth, fifth, or sixth
   course.
   What has been said here about using the first two fingers for
   colorating/there are many, who know to help themselves by this
   knowledge quite conveniently, also apart from coloraturen, by using the
   first two fingers instead of the thumb and index. And this way the
   middle finger acts as a substitute for the thumb, to whom it is most
   equal -concerning strength."
   ((translation from German by me. Puh, that oldfashioned German)

   >I would be working on pieces and asking in what passages the teacher
   would recommend playing treble lines with m-i as opposed to p-i.
   Personally, I would rather
   >play moving lines with p-i whenever possible.

   Besides of historical style and difficulty, it's a matter of taste.
   - If Besard was your teacher, see above.
   - Vallet uses always m-i for treble lines mixed with basses, presumably
   also for single treble lines. For bass lines he uses p-i (like Besard).
   - If I remember right Lundgren gives this recommendation: treble lines
   with a bass for every four notes--> m-i, treble lines with a bass for
   every six or more notes --> p-i,
      treble lines without bass--> p-i (like Besard).
   - (I am no teacher.) I prefer the thumb under hand position pure or
   modified, as recommended by Damiani.  I think it mostly sounds better.
   But that jumping of the thumb!
       For music in the older style (before ?1570?) always p-i (with some
   middle finger on the strong beat before a low note or after
   punctuation, as already said) , lest there
       is a strong reason to  deviate. For the newer style (Dowland and
   later): hand position similar to thumb under, treble and bass lines
   p-i, trebles mixed with basses: like
       Lundgren or like Vallet (it depends).

   > The idea of placing the little finger on the top of the lute and not
   moving it - locking it into that spot - makes no sense to me and seems
   contrary to the goal of creating
   > a moving, musically satisfying effect.

   Yes, I agree. And it is impossible playing from the first down to  e.g.
   the 4th course without  moving the pinky; it must be moved to
   compensate for the shift of the articulating fingers across the
   strings. See also  Damiani's method 3.1, p. 20.

   Best wishes

   Karl

   --

References

   1. http://musickshandmade.com/lute/facbooks/view/12


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to