On Oct 4, 2009, at 3:11 PM, Roman Turovsky wrote: > EM revival in general was a reaction to this type of (neo)modernism.
In that context, anything is possible. I knew a college professor back in the day who was a composer. He called his work "radical-neo- post-diatonicism." The weird thing was that he was deadly serious about it. That's really how he wanted to be known! I have enough trouble with Charles Mouton, without having to contend with neo-styro- HIP. Best, David Rastall dlu...@verizon.net www.rastallmusic.com -- To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
